|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. You are selling PSA's opinion. The buyer should determine if they agree or not. No need to disclose your suspicion. 2. Send it back to PSA for a review. If it comes back the same then again, you are selling PSA's opinion. No need to disclose. The buyer should determine if they are comfortable with the grade. 3. Again, your selling a TPG's opinion, SGC in this instance. Maybe the card is not trimmed and PSA was incorrect. No need to disclose. 4. PSA doesn't cross a lot of cards in other TPG holders so that doesn't mean the card isn't graded properly by SGC. However, if a potential buyer asks, then be upfront and tell the truth about your attempted results. I would add though, I would disclose any of these if a potential buyer asked me. Last edited by DeanH3; 02-06-2018 at 04:57 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perhaps the most unethical thing I've seen in our hobby. Topps should be ashamed | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 11-07-2014 11:45 AM |
| Blatantly Hacked and Kudos to Rob Lifson PSA should be ashamed! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 04-15-2013 07:12 PM |