![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: In your estimation, what percentage have been trimmed? | |||
Less than 10% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 23.26% |
Between 10% & 20% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 22.09% |
Between 20% & 30% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 15.12% |
Between 30% & 40% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 12.79% |
Between 40% & 50% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 10.47% |
Between 50% & 60% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 2.33% |
Between 60% & 70% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.16% |
Between 70% & 80% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 4.65% |
Between 80% & 90% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 3.49% |
More then 90% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 4.65% |
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In your estimation, what percentage of cards that are 50+ years old that reside in TPG slabs graded 8, 9 or 10 have been trimmed?
(yes, the percentage options are not comprehensive) Last edited by Matt; 07-27-2010 at 06:09 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Overall, I think the percentage is pretty small (under 5%.) But the more valuable the card, and the older it is, I think the percentage climbs.
Edited to add: Despite the low %, the vast number of cards could still be huge. Maybe a poll is needed?
__________________
Jim Van Brunt Last edited by Jim VB; 07-27-2010 at 05:46 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know the answer to that because it would be mere speculation; what is not speculation, however, is that 100% of the 8s, 9s and 10s in slabs are worth more than the untrimmed 5s, 6s and 7s.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff - that's the point - it's a gauge on collector perception, not on the cards themselves.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Matt, I'm not sure that it even gauges collector perception. Inevitably, many of the purported 'have-nots' -- who only buy 3s, 4s, and 5s -- will claim that all the high graded stuff is trimmed, even though they don't think so, so as to smugly rationalize why they don't go for the expensive stuff.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by Matt; 07-27-2010 at 06:12 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hell, it doesn't make a difference if people think the cards in 9 and 10 holders are trimmed -- they sell themselves. I can't say the same for cards in 2-5 holders.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is known as the "reverse smugly." I have no clue but I would not be surprised at all if it were well in excess of 20%. Remember we are talking about a fairly small sample, 50+ years old and a 8/9/10.
Last edited by HRBAKER; 07-27-2010 at 06:38 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just imagine if you were an alchemist and could turn one into the other.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt- I think you mean 8/9/10...fix your heading.
Of course this is all speculation. Nobody has seen more than a tiny fraction of all the high grade cards, so any response is very unscientific. I chose under 10% but it wouldn't surprise me if there were more than that. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw the title of this thread and thought it meant cards graded on Aug. 19 of this year.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly what I thought also.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I said 10%-20% but think that could be low..
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have collected pre-WW II high grades for more than 30 years. Many of the finer specimens in our collection were acquired long-before the formal grading services were established.
Of the thousands of PSA 8 and PSA 9 cards that we have had, as well a number of PSA 6's and PSA 7's in the much tougher early E card sets, we have found only 12 cards that were trimmed. Oddly five of those cards came from one auction house, in two separate transactions. and three cards were Teletrade acquisitions. Thanks to assistance of Rob Lifson, we were able to obtain full refunds - either from the dealer or PSA on all but two of the cards. Accordingly, it is our conclusion that 3% of all early high grade cards might be trimmed or altered...but it should be the buyer's responsibility to review the card carefully. And, of course, consider who is selling you the card. The cardinal rule of "trust no one" double check everyone makes a great deal of sense when one is spending upwards of four or five figures on a piece of old cardboard. Looking forward to many great finds at the NATIONAL. Bruce Dorskind America's Toughest Want List bdorskind@dorskindgroup.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE MARKEL REPORT: Are Graded Baseball Cards Being “Juiced” (Aesthetically Enhanced)? | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 131 | 11-10-2009 10:51 AM |
A lot of Vintage cards from 64 and up! Selling them CHEAP! | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 04-24-2006 03:22 PM |
Trimmed cards graded as Authentic: how are they priced? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-16-2005 11:17 AM |
Storage of SCG Graded Cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-23-2005 09:56 PM |
probably of occurance of vintage cards?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 12-14-2004 10:54 PM |