![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dylan
I dont know if this has been discussed but apparently Beckett is now listing Babe Ruth's 1933 Goudey card as his rookie card. According to Beckett for a card to qualify as a rookie card it has to come from a "mainstream" set. I think this is ridiculous. For one thing Babe Ruth had been in the league for 19 years by the time his '33 Goudey card was released. What exactly qualifies as mainstream anyways, pretty subjective. So According to Beckett if a player has a card from t206, t205, or Goudey it automaticaly becomes that players rookie card no matter what? Huh?? |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
vintage rookie cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 11-28-2007 06:18 AM |
Rookie Cards on Vintage Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-18-2007 02:31 AM |
For Vintage Prices...If not Beckett's then... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 12-14-2006 03:35 PM |
Vintage rookie cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-23-2006 11:03 AM |
Not Baseball, But It Is Vintage, and A Rookie Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-01-2005 01:46 PM |