 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-23-2010, 08:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
T206: What About Front Scarcity?
After all the recent posts dedicated to T206 back scarcity I have a question. What about front scarcity? What I mean is, are certain players, regardless of the advertising on the back, just tougher to come across than others? Is a Bender portrait more difficult to find than a Wallace portrait (for example)? Do you see more Merkle portraits than Merkle throwing (for example)? Has a study ever been done (and available) that discusses how much tougher certain cards are to find (NOT Southern Leaguers) than others? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
__________________
I Remember Now. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTT: T206 low grade for same | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-16-2008 04:58 AM |
| WTB T206 cards w/ wet sheet transfer's showing on front | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 07-19-2008 09:05 PM |
| Please post your T206 Ritchey cards front and back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 07-06-2006 03:08 PM |
| T206 back variations: price multiplier and scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-13-2006 08:51 PM |
| t206 back scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-27-2005 11:21 AM |
Threaded Mode