 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
11-12-2015, 02:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Printers error
Yes, but so is the 57 Bakep and the 58 Herrer, and maybe the 52 Campos black star or missing front border. All famous "variations".
What is the hobby definition of a true variation anyway ?  What is your definition ? Intentional change made to a card ? What about double prints with differences like the 52 Mantle ? Intentional ? Variation ?PSA has been listing a 61 Fairly with a smudge of green in the baseball on the back as a variation. Is it just a print defect ? Who is to say ? Who is the arbiter ? No wrong views in my mind. Hobby conundrum. Some variants catch on, others do not. If you have one, it tends to be a variation, or you want it to be 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970 topps printing error ? Proof ? Help | MGHPro | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 09-03-2015 07:23 AM |
| 1970 topps proofs? Printing error ? Help | MGHPro | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 09-02-2015 02:16 PM |
| 1971 Topps Vada Pinson - Pretty Cool | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 01-29-2015 08:03 AM |
| 92 topps printing error? | TAVG | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 01-12-2015 07:04 AM |
| T206 printing error variations...still considered premiums? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-29-2007 07:49 AM |
Threaded Mode