|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone heard about a 1963 Bud Daley card (should be #38) instead the back is #68 Friendly Foes Snider and Hodges?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
That would be interesting, as the Daley card is not immediately adjacent to the 68 Foes card on the uncut sheet, but it is two cards below the Daley card......could have been a severe misprint on the back portion of the sheet to have caused this. I can't recall seeing a wrong back due to a back misprint of anything more than an immediately adjacent card. Certainly would be unique....obviously, most of the cards from that sheet would have the same wrong back so maybe someone else has at least seen one of these other non-adjacent wrong backed cards.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is a list of wrong backs in my 1963 Topps Set. Interesting first card as neither lived to see the beginning of the 1964 season!
Ken Hubbs (15) / Jim Umbricht (99) Bob Allison (75) John Buzhardt (35) Jim Hickman (107) / Jim O'Toole (70) Bomber's Best (173) / Juan Pizzaro (160) and Bubba Phillips (177) miscut wrong back Joe Amalfitano (199) / Power Plus (242) Mickey Mantle (200) / Billy O'Dell (235) Red Sox Team (202) / Chico Fernandez (278) 1963 Rookie Stars (208) / Bob Miller (261) Sandy Koufax (210) / Harvey Haddix (239) Gene Conley (216) / Bob Allen (266) Willie Davis (229) / Orlando Pena (214) Pete Runnels (230) / Jim Grant (227) Eli Grba (231) / Ed Mathews (275) Casey Stengel (233) / Al Dark (258) Jim Coates (237) / Ron Santo (252) John Tsitouris (244) / Don Nottebart (204) Jack Lamabe (251) / Sammy Taylor (273) 1963 Rookie Stars (253) / Billy Smith (241) Bob Shaw (255) / Hank Aguirre (257) Hank Aguirre (257) / Bob Shaw (255) Johnny Logan (259) / Cookie Rojas (221) Jim Gentile (260) / Leo Burke (249) Bob Miller (261) / 1963 Rookie Stars (208) Ellis Burton (262) / Phil Linz (264) Vada Pinson (265) / Joe Jay (225) Felipe Alou (270) / Mike Roarke (224) Danny Murphy (272) / Don Demeter (268) Sammy Taylor (273) / Jack Lamabe (251) Ed Mathews (275) / Eli Grba (231) Chico Fernandez (278) / Red Sox Team (202) Bob Del Greco (282) / Lee Stange (246) Roy Sievers (283) / 1963 Rookie Stars (228) Del Crandall (460) / Phil Regan (494) Wally Post (462) / Charlie Neal (511) Lou Brock (472) / Jerry Adair (488) Gus Triandos (475) / Felix Torres (482) Paul Brown (478) / Roland Sheldon (507) Ed Brinkman (479) / Ray Sadecki (486) Jim Landis (485) / Indians Team (451) Walt Bond (493) / Joe Schaffernoth (463) Curt Flood (505) / Jay Hook (469) Roland Sheldon (507) / Paul Brown (478) Bob Clemente (540) / Don Mossi (530) Al Worthington (556) / Jose Tartabull (449) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Check out the top border on these two. The blurriness is the actual card, not my scanner.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll try a closer look this time.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
One more time
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
A Long Island dealer named Dan Jacobsen had a 66 card partial sheet of framed 63's he used to bring to shows just because he liked showing it to people. IIRC it had issues similar to those above with the broken neatlines and unsaturated colors. I think he retired and moved but I'm not sure what happened to the sheet. Can't recall if the backs were errors though.
Last edited by toppcat; 02-18-2017 at 08:11 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Those are out of register cards, I have seen several of them from 62, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, and 70. 63 was a particularly bad year for them, I have seen some spectacular ones. Poor quality control in the 60’s.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
If it's real, then a 6th series back sheet was in fed into a 7th series front
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are s few more 1st series wrong backs. I will send post when I get home on Monday.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
As a person who actually wrote an E&V Column back in the day I can assure you that we all had individual ways of looking at things.
The Thomas NNOF came out of packs that way and it was such an obvious difference that it should have been a variation noted as such in 1990. Instead it did take a couple of years for widespread recognition. I will say even today doing this type of work for COMC I'm more OK than ever with these subtle differences. Even if it's just in printing, if there is enough of a difference I don't mind adding it to the DB. That's on both a knowledge and a business sense. To me the purest variation is something akin to the 1962 Topps Wally Moon card in which the poses are obviously different. The 1961 Fairly is an obvious printing issue but again fairly obvious which is why I'm fine with that one as well. But, in reality, it's sometimes an individual decision but I'll listen to any and all logic on any of these Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know that the series 6 wrong backs have the backs printed upside down relative to what the regular back should be. What about the others you have? Are the series 1 , 2, and 3 wrong backs correctly oriented or are they upside down?
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
From what I have seen, first series wrong backs resulted from the backs being switched on the giant 264 card sheet, or Slit A and Slit B as you refer to them, and all of the other 1963 series wrong backs resulted from the backs being flipped upside down, which is understandable with how the 63's were printed. The two exceptions are the first series S. Williams/Hendley wrong back, which I suspect may be from a 3 card salesman sample panel, and the Worthington/Tartabull wrong back which must have come from a very rare 7th series front sheet mistakenly printed with a 6th series back.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the first series backs are correctly oriented, then the two slits were oriented the way they are shown in the attached image. If the wrong backs are upside down, then one of the slits is flipped 180 degrees from that shown.
1963_series1_full.jpg |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
While attempting to ascertain the printing pattern (slit configuration) for 1963 Topps series 5, came across this oddity for card # 395.
1963_395_double_back_print.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970 topps printing error ? Proof ? Help | MGHPro | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 09-03-2015 08:23 AM |
| 1970 topps proofs? Printing error ? Help | MGHPro | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 09-02-2015 03:16 PM |
| 1971 Topps Vada Pinson - Pretty Cool | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 01-29-2015 09:03 AM |
| 92 topps printing error? | TAVG | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 01-12-2015 08:04 AM |
| T206 printing error variations...still considered premiums? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-29-2007 08:49 AM |