![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes the grading sure was different! But it was also based on the naked eye. A gorgeous card that has a minute wrinkle that you can only see magnified 10 times, was considered NM. And that was acceptable in a hobby that had collectors instead of investors.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1961-63 Post Cereal Baseball Card Books | Dan Mabey | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-29-2012 06:57 PM |
1963 Post Cereal Card Question | slidekellyslide | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 12-07-2010 08:10 PM |
show your current favorite b & w card post 1900... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 02-28-2008 10:23 PM |
Koerber Post Card Co. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-18-2005 04:54 PM |
E card appreciation post | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-26-2004 03:35 PM |