![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The jury is still out on these unintended printing glitches. They often sell for a lot of money, but not all serious T206 collectors embrace them. They differ from Doyle or Magie as they were not the result of a deliberate revision, but were caused by a foreign substance getting onto the plate and blocking a bit of the ink. Whether or not they are worth the money is subjective.
You're confusing genuine printing corrections with unintentional printing mishaps. Big difference. Last edited by barrysloate; 11-03-2011 at 12:13 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The answer could be simply that after they fixed the Magee error, and the cost was submitted to the boss, they said "No more expensive fixes!"
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's my thought though...using the 'Dopner' one as just an example...the 'p' instead of an 'r' seems to be more than just a printing mishap caused by a foreign substance, etc. - PSA slabbed the 'p', so it would appear that the stone actually had 'Dopner' on it, and then later it was changed to 'Dorner' - ie, the 'p' was intentionally fixed to an 'r' at some point by the printer...so is this just an un-documented error that was intentionally corrected?...and, this is a '1 of 1', so apparently it's very rare...why isn't this talked about as much as Magie?...that's what I'd like to read more on...how did the Magie and Nat'l corrections become so legendary, when it would seem that there are other corrections that are similarly as rare, yet just weren't documented in the same way, for some reason...
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
the fact that psa slabbed it as such is meaningless!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Taborton (not your real name): I don't think that's true. First, as Peter mentioned, PSA are not experts. So forget about the label. I don't believe at all it was intentionally printed as Dopner and then corrected. I believe it's an "R" missing a serif. Again, I will defer to the board experts but I think that's the case.
Last edited by barrysloate; 11-03-2011 at 02:23 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Barry is correct. If one were to look at thousands of T206's noting every variance they will find many many examples of these printing defects. Some stand out more than others and a few like the Nodgrass have garnered more attention and a higher premium. Ultimately they are not variations like the Doyle and Magie.
Last edited by Abravefan11; 11-03-2011 at 02:29 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T201 Mecca, T205 Gold, T206 White, OM T210-3 | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 14 | 10-21-2011 07:01 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
Joe Doyle of T206 N.Y. Nat'l variation fame | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-13-2009 03:41 PM |
T206 Joe Doyle Question (or "The Uncommon Common") | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-20-2007 12:37 PM |
T206 Doyle Nat'l Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-18-2007 04:49 PM |