![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good post, Larry!
I'd think it's probably safe to add Wagner to that list along with Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb, and Matty. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What I don't get is how the Goudey Ruth and Gehrigs are so pricey when there were so many of each in the sets, and apparently there were tons printed. I can understand the non-Goudeys of these two, but if I were investing in a Goudey Ruth or Gehrig, it would have to be high-grade.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When selling a card though, don't you have to pay fees? I know if I sell something on ebay I have to pay an ebay fee and a paypal fee. Isn't it hard to "make money" selling cards if you always have to overcome a ~20% hurdle just to break even? What about taxes?
Last edited by jezzeaepi; 10-30-2011 at 01:05 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Goudey cards are probably closest to being liquid (if there is such a thing) due to the popularity of the set(s). The 1934 Goudey Gehrig #37 is iconic and will likely always find a buyer. Cobb and Wagner are probably the safest bets (in that order), but Matty, Ruth, Gehrig aren't far behind and are in the same discussion. If non-collectors have heard of them (Cobb, Wagner, Ruth and Gehrig all qualify), then you know there is collectibility there. Collectibility breeds demand, which raises cost. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Like any other investment, diversification would be the key. Buying a high end, expensive card is akin to putting all your money in the stock market. There is a greater upside, but also a greater downside. By buying a wide range of cards from different eras, you are better protecting the downside of your investment, although your appreciation may be slower.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It was what I like to call "an aside". I got off-track, sorry for that, but thanks for your thoughts.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|