![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's another thing that sparked this thread. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Based on the list I'd either go with the T206 Plank or "other". My "other" suggestion would be tough to find 19th century material. Yeah you could blow your wad on one card but IO'd probably spread it around and pick up a few nice cards.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For $25K, how about 2,500 low grade T206s for $10 each. If the price goes to $14 each in a few years that's better than a single $25K high grade HOFer that appreciated to $32K.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Makes sense!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A few caveats.
I decided I would not invest in ball cards a long time ago because I enjoy them too much and cannot be objective about it. I just collect. Long term, a Plank would be great, but I sense a tick up. You might not get as much card as you would think in the range you are talking about, in which case you need to reevaluate. I really think the way to go for a good short-term, replicatable return would be to buy a nice set of a popular issue in good grade and bust it immediately, sell individually, repeat. I am an example of how collectors are willing to pay more individually to complete their set, but are less interested in complete sets, because the thrill is in the hunt, not the kill. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From an "investment" standpoint, I would stay away from the 52 Mantle. This card is far more common than people realize, and as Baby Boomers pass on, I can't see demand keeping up with the increase in supply. Some people might think I'm way off base, but I could really see high grade vintage wrapper and older display boxes becoming more sought after as the years go by. From a card standpoint, It seems that really high grade vintage hockey always outperforms SMR. Just not a lot of it, and hockey fans/collectors are always very passionate.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd go with "other" and pick up a Joe Jackson. I don't see them ever going down, only up or at worst, staying level for a little while. On the chance that he is eventually allowed into the HOF (I'm hopeful!), possible short term bubble to sell for a decent profit if that is what someone wants to do.
Last edited by BCauley; 10-27-2011 at 08:46 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ruth Ruth Ruth Ruth
or anyone in the Class of '36 Last edited by Orioles1954; 10-27-2011 at 11:08 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't know that I'd like my retirement to hinge on one item that I would have to pay insurance on. I realize that all investments have management fees, but dang!
|
![]() |
|
|