1907 W600 Cobb

bcbgcbrcb · #1 10-22-2011, 10:59 AM

Please correct me if I'm wrong, Kevin, but Branch Rickey was another HOF'er that was first offered on Sporting Life checklists around 1907 but no known copies are believed to exist.

ls7plus · #2 10-22-2011, 12:30 PM

Thanks, Phil and Kevin. The release of Cobb much later in the run was a factor I hadn't considered. My personal feeling is that all of his cards from 1907, regardless of which was issued first during that year, will stand their ground as rookies (I don't believe that multicplicity is in conclict with the notion of a "rookie" card). IMHO, the 1906 team card doesn't qualify any more than does the 1967 Topps Mets team card, which, going by memory, does include Nolan Ryan, although the 1906 Sporting Life postcard will certainly always be a valuable card. But, we've had these discussions before, and probably the real question will be what the market decides the relative values are to be between the W600 and the team card in the future. Certainly either card would be one of the cornerstones of any great collection!

Best wishes to all the dedicated collectors out there (but I doubt that I'm going to find a new hobby),

Larry

PS: Greg, you're certainly right that attrition would have been a factor in the card's ultimate rarity, not just due to time, but the fact of paper drives associated with each World War.

Baseball Rarities · #3 10-22-2011, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ls7plus

Thanks, Phil and Kevin. The release of Cobb much later in the run was a factor I hadn't considered. My personal feeling is that all of his cards from 1907, regardless of which was issued first during that year, will stand their ground as rookies (I don't believe that multicplicity is in conclict with the notion of a "rookie" card). IMHO, the 1906 team card doesn't qualify any more than does the 1967 Topps Mets team card, which, going by memory, does include Nolan Ryan, although the 1906 Sporting Life postcard will certainly always be a valuable card. But, we've had these discussions before, and probably the real question will be what the market decides the relative values are to be between the W600 and the team card in the future. Certainly either card would be one of the cornerstones of any great collection!

Larry - I totally agree with you about Cobb's different 1907 rookie cards. I am certainly not trying to define what is or is not a rookie card - cabinet card, postcard, team card, etc. I was just trying to give collectors a timeline of when Cobb's different rookie cards were first issued.

I am very fond of the 1906 Sporting Life postcard set of 16 teams and feel that since the players are each represented by a recognizable portrait and are individually identified that it is much more substantial than a 1967 team card, but I certainly understand why others would disagree.

ls7plus · #4 10-23-2011, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baseball Rarities

Larry - I totally agree with you about Cobb's different 1907 rookie cards. I am certainly not trying to define what is or is not a rookie card - cabinet card, postcard, team card, etc. I was just trying to give collectors a timeline of when Cobb's different rookie cards were first issued.

I am very fond of the 1906 Sporting Life postcard set of 16 teams and feel that since the players are each represented by a recognizable portrait and are individually identified that it is much more substantial than a 1967 team card, but I certainly understand why others would disagree.

I completely agree with you there, Kevin. It's a lot like coin collcectors preferring the sheer size of double eagles as opposed to more dime-like gold dollars, or why Morgan silver dollars have proven popular. Bigger is better, and the size of the Cobb portrait postcard gives it a totlally different feel than the '67 Topps Mets team picture. It is simply a great card, classified as rookie or not.

May all the collecting winds be at your back, sailing you right to your goals,

Larry

paul · #5 10-23-2011, 03:44 PM

Were the players that were offered early on -- like 1902 -- offered for the entire print run? In other words, was Delahanty still available in the 1907-10 time frame?

Paul

bcbgcbrcb · #6 10-23-2011, 04:33 PM

Paul:

My guess would be yes although interest in retired players likely would have dwindled within a couple of years.

Baseball Rarities · #7 10-23-2011, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by paul

Were the players that were offered early on -- like 1902 -- offered for the entire print run? In other words, was Delahanty still available in the 1907-10 time frame?

Paul

The Sporting Life continued to offer players after their playing days until their supply of that player ran out. In the case of Delehanty, the SL offered his card through October of 1903 - three months after his death.

Other players, such as Louis Castro, were offered for years after they played baseball. Castro's last year in the Majors was in 1902, but the SL was still offering his card as late as 1907 - the last year that I have records for. Obviously, he was not a popular choice by the readers of the SL.

When the SL offered their cards, they organized most of the players by their current team. In September of 1903, they began offering "Other Noted Players" which consisted of retired players.

sb1 · #8 10-23-2011, 05:24 PM

It would be hard to believe that only 6 or perhaps even 10 Cobbs are all that exist. In the last 15 months four different ones have been sold, and I am aware of at least two others. Surely there are more out there than 6-10??

As Kevin and others have alluded to the W600's offered changed on an ongoing basis. Many players were offered for several years, others only a short time. As late as 1913 they were stilling offering left over stock.

Baseball Rarities · #9 10-22-2011, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb

Please correct me if I'm wrong, Kevin, but Branch Rickey was another HOF'er that was first offered on Sporting Life checklists around 1907 but no known copies are believed to exist.

Rickey was first issued at the very beginning of 1906. AFAIK, there are no known examples of him.

I also have never seen an example of Baker, though I have been told that it does exist. I believe that I have seen images of all of the other HOFers.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What We Have Learned About Ty Cobbs With a Ty Cobb Back	canjond	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	152	06-07-2019 03:09 PM
Kreindler's Cobb Stealing Third	Kawika	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	6	10-05-2009 03:03 PM
Cobb w/ Cobb Back Wet Sheet Transfer	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	8	03-25-2008 02:09 PM
Cobb vs. Ruth	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	46	07-09-2004 06:06 PM
2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	29	03-13-2002 06:40 PM