![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi, Jamie,
Based on your photo of the Lundgren it appears that the down-stroke and corresponding upstroke on the -N has worn away. As such, I don't see how it would qualify as a variant. I have seen cards in my collecting experience where there is evidence of similar wear to a player's name. Happy Fourth to you and everyone else! Cheers, Mike |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hello Jamie,
Here is my example of the partial "N" (Piedmont 150), plus a Lundgren without the partial "N" (tougher Piedmont 350). Whether it is a variation or not is for others to debate, but since I have one..........I'm calling it a variation along the same lines of the partial "S" in Nodgrass. The "N" stroke has not worn away, it simply is not there. Jamie actually pointed-out the partial "N" Lundgren in a prior thread a few years back and ever since then I've been looking for another. I've found one more (in an eBay auction about a year ago) but past on pulling the snipe trigger. pic 016.jpgpic 017.jpg pic 019.jpgpic 020.jpg Lovely Day... Last edited by iggyman; 07-04-2011 at 09:41 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
T206 gallery |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cool chris.. thanks for pointing that one for sale out..
So since others do exist (thanks Iggy).. I WOULD consider it a varation... wouldnt others agree? Still looking for a reasonable explination on whi it would not be a variation.... Thanks Jamie |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are there any P150s that do not have the partial 'N'?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've mentioned another possible variation before, but never really pushed it, because I thought it was just exclusive to certain backs...BUT there's two on ebay right now, that show the variation existing even among the same back.
http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-11-T206-PIE...item53e828934f http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-1911-T206-O...item2c5d49b048 Both of these Wilson's have the Piedmont 350 back. While showing both variations in the red/orange burst in the background.. By that same thought, is this partial N exclusive to the Piedmont 150's, and is there complete N versions within the Piedmont 150's? Last edited by novakjr; 07-05-2011 at 10:24 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Piedmont 150 backs can be found with the partial "N" and with the full "N". I'm relatively sure that partial "N's" do not exist with Piedmont 350 nor EL Principe Del Gales backs.
Dislaimer: This board sometimes has a way of proving people that make assertions or assurances look a bit foolish ![]() Lovely Day... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
If it's a card with no variation within the same back, then I'd probably just consider it "that backs" version of the card...Which is what I originally thought the Wilson to be, until I saw both versions with the P350.. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another New T205 Variation | marcdelpercio | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 08-30-2010 01:35 PM |
T206 Lundgren | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-21-2009 09:36 AM |
Errors & Variation Discoveries Thread | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 03-24-2008 09:04 PM |
T206 Carl Lundgren, Chicago variation | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 05-06-2007 10:44 AM |
The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |