Simple Poll: PSA 5 w/ Crease -- Disclose?

[teetwoohsix]

Great post Johnny !!

I agree with everyone who agrees with disclosing, it's simply just the right thing to do. I always feel comfortable buying from someone who I know will let me know if there's something you can't really see on a scan.

Mike's Meyers portrait is a perfect example of why a seller should disclose regardless of the grade issued.

Clayton

[mrvster]

Clayton,

Thanks bro....your one of the collectors who make this hobby enjoyable for me......

Robert-

OMG!!!....no offense, that is a return and one UGLY 7!!, i was very happy with my last heritage purchase, but someone needs a set of bi-focals at both fine establishments...maybe they spilled some beer on that one when grading

Good luck!

Peace

Johnny

[T206Collector]

The number of f*ckups I see in PSA holders really makes me sick.

I have a pet theory that people often sell the PSA cards because they're way overgraded, and they don't cross over into SGC holders. So the market for PSA cards ends up being greater ironically.

[Gradedcardman]

Bobby the stained cards are also overlooked by PSA. I had a PSA 5 t206 with a ugly stain as well. Sold it with the stain disclosed by the way !

[asoriano]

Originally Posted by T206Collector

The number of f*ckups I see in PSA holders really makes me sick.

I couldn't agree more.

After purchasing a PSA graded T205 Drum that SGC deemed re-colored (on all four of the corners), I've given up on their grading standards.

[Jcfowler6]

I think that eye appeal trumps card grade always. Therefore disclose.

Anyone ever seen a card with the wrong label from a grade company? They are humans and make errors. So we should always have integrity. How many times we say "it's a 2 but should have been higher"? The same applies in the other direction.

IMHO