![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My oh my, that is a beautiful site
![]() Thanks for posting that John, and I'm glad to see you're breathing again ![]() As much as I would love to have a Brown OM or Brown Lenox,,I would think to represent all backs the Blacks would be just fine for me...$$ says so. As far as a blank back, would also love to have one, but don't feel it's mandatory because it doesn't have a cig ad on the back.......but if you can get one grab it for sure. I love the blank backs (where are you Johnny? ![]() That is an awesome display- it's amazing !!! Nice job on that !!! Ty Cobb with Ty Cobb back....... would look so sweet in your collection, but I'd say you've accomplished the back run at this point!!!!! Sincerely, Clayton |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Clayton, I'm making tweeks to the rest of the site and will make more sections public later just thought I would share this part for now early.
Also thanks fo rthe kind words on the run, I have much higher graded examples of many of those backs but I really took time to oick the best ones for color, centering and how clean they were all around. I agree done but you never know always more upgrades to be found. ![]() Cheers, John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That has to be one of the better conditioned back runs out there. Nice job and thanks for sharing the scans. I enjoy looking at other collectors collections.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BABY GOT BACKS!!
![]() John, HOLY CRAP! ![]() That is Freakn' AWESOME!!! you blow me away when you post your collection...what a super sweet display ![]() ![]() Here I am Clayton ![]() IMO- all factory cut dispersed cards should be included in this run, pre-production/hand cut/not dispersed cards i feel shouldn't be included(brown old mill, blank, Ty,overprint bar)......Brown Lenox is factory cut and although nearly impossible, it was inserted so it should be included.... there should be a "subset" chase back which included the blank, brown om, Ty, etc....anything not factory inserted..... I would like to also vote to include error backs!!!!!DOES THIS BLOW ANYONE AWAY??? ![]() as a subset....... special subset: upside down, upside down2back, upside down 4 back, split back, etc...etc.. these two catagories would be neat ![]() Just my 2 cents in the land of misfit toys....John, love your posts ![]() Peace Johhny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great idea to scan those cards so you'll have a record of them.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice run. I think the Carolina Brights back is the best design for sure.
__________________
t205 midgrade and always looking for M101-2 Sporting News Supplements Last edited by Mrc32; 05-19-2011 at 06:23 AM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
John - Congratulations on putting together such an impressive run.
The Blank Back and Old Mill - Brown backs are both printers scrap and never issued in a pack. For this reason I can understand why some wouldn't consider these backs necessary for a complete back run. I personally feel like they've reached a level of acceptance within the T206 collecting community that I would want to own an example of each if I were going to complete a back run. If SGC is going to list a Blank Back on their registry then Old Mill - Brown should be listed as well. Either include or exclude both. Sovereign - Apple Green should definitely be added as well. The color change from forest green to apple green was a conscious decision made during the printing process. It's no different than the color change on the Hindu backs except the Sovereign color difference wasn't as drastic and didn't have as much time pass between changes. But the two colors were printed during two different times in production on two different groups of subjects. I'm 99% sure the Cobb/Cobb was not part of the issue that most of us call T206. It's just my opinion based on everything I know at this time about the subject but others will and do feel differently and that's OK. Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-19-2011 at 06:33 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Congrats John. As of this moment (and I reserve the right to change my mind) I don't think the Ty Cobb back is part of T206. Even though I have been a staunch supporter of Burdick's writings, the more I study him, the more I know HE KNEW there were mistakes and wanted help correcting them. I think I could go with a type 1 set of backs that has all that were inserted into packs/containers and then a type 2 back set including the anomalies. The Type 2 being the master set but not necessary to consider the subset complete. As I said, I could change my mind but those are my current thoughts. Great looking backs you have there!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
John,
That is a great accomplishment. They look very impressive when they are all in one photo. Why not add the Ty Cobb back. That way there will be no doubt that you have completed the entire set of backs. Congrats again, Tony |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: MISC T206 T3's | grandslamcardscria | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2010 02:29 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
T205 and T206 Cards Available | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 04-06-2007 02:15 PM |
T206 for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 02-23-2007 07:21 PM |
My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 11:43 AM |