![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I may go back and look at that but need to process what I did this week first. Something does still seem missing but it looks like you found a new quad? I only have six of those (I think). One of the quads is a traded player so it skews the numbers I think but I am fried right now but an additonal quad (7) would make sense.
Last edited by toppcat; 01-09-2011 at 04:18 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HI Dave,
Incredible work. I haven't digested it yet, have to go back for a second run through. Not sure if I missed this, but I believe I have stargell with a stadium background and plain background - can double check and let you know. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, both plain background.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have this set and the captain poses. Most of it is ungraded, by choice. But in collecting the set I have acquired some graded cards and seen several. I have also had and seen several uncut 3 card panels. You can separate the panels by bending them until they separate or cut them.
On a 3 card panel the top and bottom card should have a straight top ot bottom border, but the middle card will have 2 uneven borders and the top and bottom one uneven border. Even if the cards are cut instead of bent to separate them you should see the perforations at at least one end, or on both ends of middle cards. Yet I have seen many highly graded cards with straight ends on the top and the bottom, which can only occur if the serated perforated edges are trimmed off Is this a case where trimming a card from it natural state is acceptable ? I am not a graded guy so am just curious as to what folks think,,,.especially Larry S Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-21-2012 at 03:04 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
of the grading companies not always knowing what they are looking at. For the educated collector it is almost laughable (as well as good justification against grading or for trimming in some cases :-))
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howard---are you related to Doug ? :-)
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-21-2012 at 03:09 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
not sold as singles
sgc seems to not care or not know that the nubs are supposed to be there |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The proof of this is illustrated in the numerous ways that they do differentiate things that they shouldn't (1967 Topps punchouts and stickers which were released as panels) and don't differentiate things that they should (T206 back variations). The fact that they do differentiate back variations on T206s now, after not doing so for many years only adds to their own bottom line, which also adds to my point. Doug Last edited by doug.goodman; 11-23-2012 at 07:05 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Larry-were the wax pack cards just separated from the panels then?
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Phillies Topps Team Sets - all cards PSA Graded | joyce02 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-09-2010 05:05 PM |
1967 Topps "Punch-Out" Cello Wrapper | BranchRickey56 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-07-2010 07:33 PM |
WTB Topps 67 Punch outs and variation & 68 MBs | ALR-bishop | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-26-2010 01:02 PM |
LARGE List of Autographed Cards For Sale - 1940s through 2000s (All Sports) | canjond | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 06-13-2009 05:54 PM |
TALL BOYS: 1964-65 Topps Hockey Cards | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 05-17-2006 05:20 AM |