![]() |
1967 Topps Punch Outs Team Checklists
I have spent the last week looking at this set in detail thanks to Al Richter's discovery of a new pose variation for the Mantle. While there may be one pose variation still to be found (jury is out on that but I feel it's possible), I'll leave most of the nuts and bolts to my most recent blog post on this crazy issue: http://toppsarchives.blogspot.com/20...ion-paper.html
Long story short, the four players thought to be in the checklist: Bob Gibson, Brooks Robinson, Roy McMillan and Bert Campaneris, appear in lineups in the set but look like No Prints as Captains. I suspect they were replaced by the four pose variations for reasons too involved to go into here but detailed in my blog post. Basically they would have fulfilled the pattern of five players per league per position. Being pulled, it looks like there are 86 players in the set, not 90. The outgrowth of this is I worked up team checklists for the set, which does not show team affiliations, so here ya go: FREGOSI JIM ANGELS KNOOP BOBBY ANGELS REICHARDT RICK ANGELS JACKSON SONNY ASTROS MORGAN JOE ASTROS WYNN JIM ASTROS CHARLES ED ATHLETICS GREEN DICK ATHLETICS HERSHBERGER MIKE ATHLETICS AARON HANK BRAVES ALOU FELIPE BRAVES CARTY RICO BRAVES MENKE DENIS BRAVES TORRE JOE BRAVES BROCK LOU CARDINALS CEPEDA ORLANDO CARDINALS FLOOD CURT CARDINALS McCARVER TIM CARDINALS SANTO RON CUBS WILLIAMS BILLY CUBS DAVIS WILLIE DODGERS KOUFAX SANDY DODGERS LEFEBVRE JIM DODGERS ROSEBORO JOHN DODGERS HALLER TOM GIANTS HART JIM RAY GIANTS MARICHAL JUAN GIANTS MAYS WILLIE GIANTS MCCOVEY WILLIE GIANTS PERRY GAYLORD GIANTS ALVIS MAX INDIANS COLAVITO ROCKY INDIANS SALMON CHICO INDIANS SIEBERT SONNY INDIANS WAGNER LEON INDIANS WHITFIELD FRED INDIANS BOYER KEN METS HUNT RON METS JONES CLEON METS KRANEPOOL ED METS APARICIO LUIS ORIOLES BARBER STEVE ORIOLES ETCHEBARREN ANDY ORIOLES POWELL BOOG ORIOLES ROBINSON FRANK (2) ORIOLES SNYDER RUSS ORIOLES ALLEN RICHIE PHILLIES BUNNING JIM PHILLIES CALLISON JOHNNY PHILLIES GROAT DICK PHILLIES WHITE BILL PHILLIES ALLEY GENE PIRATES ALOU MATTY (2) PIRATES CLEMENTE ROBERTO (2) PIRATES CLENDENON DONN PIRATES MAZEROSKI BILL PIRATES STARGELL WILLIE PIRATES CONIGLIARO TONY RED SOX SCOTT GEORGE RED SOX YASTRZEMSKI CARL RED SOX CARDENAS LEO REDS EDWARDS JOHNNY REDS PINSON VADA REDS ROSE PETE REDS HOWARD FRANK SENATORS LOCK DON SENATORS CASH NORM TIGERS FREEHAN BILL TIGERS KALINE AL TIGERS LUMPE JERRY TIGERS McAULIFFE DICK TIGERS McLAIN DENNY TIGERS BATTEY EARL TWINS KAAT JIM TWINS KILLEBREW HARMON TWINS OLIVA TONY TWINS TOVAR CESAR TWINS VERSALLES ZOILO TWINS ROBINSON FLOYD WHITE SOX ROMANO JOHN WHITE SOX BOYER CLETE YANKEES HOWARD ELSTON YANKEES MANTLE MICKEY (2) YANKEES PEPITONE JOE YANKEES STOTTLEMYRE MEL YANKEES TRESH TOM YANKEES |
punchouts
good work on the 2 shortstops 1 3b and 1 pitcher makes sense
however there are 14 singles 41 doubles 24 triples and 7 quads for a total of 196 with 2 lineups still missing to make 198 |
Quote:
|
I believe I own 2 Stargells
HI Dave,
Incredible work. I haven't digested it yet, have to go back for a second run through. Not sure if I missed this, but I believe I have stargell with a stadium background and plain background - can double check and let you know. |
I was wrong
Sorry, both plain background.
|
Grading of Punch Outs
I have this set and the captain poses. Most of it is ungraded, by choice. But in collecting the set I have acquired some graded cards and seen several. I have also had and seen several uncut 3 card panels. You can separate the panels by bending them until they separate or cut them.
On a 3 card panel the top and bottom card should have a straight top ot bottom border, but the middle card will have 2 uneven borders and the top and bottom one uneven border. Even if the cards are cut instead of bent to separate them you should see the perforations at at least one end, or on both ends of middle cards. Yet I have seen many highly graded cards with straight ends on the top and the bottom, which can only occur if the serated perforated edges are trimmed off Is this a case where trimming a card from it natural state is acceptable ? I am not a graded guy so am just curious as to what folks think,,,.especially Larry S |
Just another case.....
of the grading companies not always knowing what they are looking at. For the educated collector it is almost laughable (as well as good justification against grading or for trimming in some cases :-))
|
grading Companies
Howard---are you related to Doug ? :-)
|
Quote:
|
punchouts
not sold as singles
sgc seems to not care or not know that the nubs are supposed to be there |
Quote:
The proof of this is illustrated in the numerous ways that they do differentiate things that they shouldn't (1967 Topps punchouts and stickers which were released as panels) and don't differentiate things that they should (T206 back variations). The fact that they do differentiate back variations on T206s now, after not doing so for many years only adds to their own bottom line, which also adds to my point. Doug |
punchouts
doug
what can we do for that white mcbride stamp panel larry |
Quote:
|
Mcbride panel
Quote:
|
67 punch
i dont think the wax packs ever existed
that wrapper is probably from topps archives there are 100s of the cello wrapper around and 0 of the wax wrapper but i guess you never know 67 standups and 68 3d wrappers cant be found and we know they were sold in packs |
...and
.....1971 Greatest Moments ?
|
Quote:
Larry - you didn't even bother to reply to my last offer. I just sent you an update, via email. Doug |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM. |