![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What about the m101 4/5 Ruth?
Last edited by vintagecpa; 01-02-2011 at 07:12 PM. Reason: M116 lol |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Red Cobb with Ty Cobb back.
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This would be my number 3, followed by Balt News Ruth
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If there was one it would be cool but he didn't play that early....maybe you mean M101-4/5?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-02-2011 at 06:38 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's the details that kill you in this hobby. That is the rookie Ruth I was referring to. I guess for me, it would be #1.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Globally, your #1 is probably accurate, but from there it goes by taste. On a pre-WW2 vintage board, you'd probably not get overwhelming support for the '52 Topps Mantle being the #2 desirable card. It being the second most recognized globally might be a different discussion, though.
Truth be told, if I had a T206 Wagner, I'd sell it because it is so universally acclaimed in order to get cards that are more desirable to me. My point is that desirability is a personal choice. So, the question really is, "What is your #3?" |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree! I am imagining by selling a T206 Wagner I would be able to finish off all of my sets/upgrades, and have plenty of money left over to start a couple more projects that I've always wanted to.
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1989 Fleer Billy Ripken "F Face" card?
Seriously, though, I'd probably have to agree with many others and go with the 1933 Goudey Lajoie. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1990 Topps Frank Thomas NNOF!
But seriously, it has to be the T206 Plank. I'd even take a Plankenstein. Last edited by 4815162342; 01-03-2011 at 08:25 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sweet! I've got your #3!
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1869 peck & snyder redstockings
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() So If I was talking to you Id be confused right there |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Baltimore News Ruth is his, usually much preferred, prookie card.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh no, not this debate. Tough crowd tonight.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |
POLL: Trimmed Card Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 12-22-2005 09:06 AM |
card sells in catalog auction...but still in dealer's showcase at shows | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-11-2005 03:42 PM |
scan manipulation, the latest (at least to me) card scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-05-2002 04:09 PM |