Announcing "Collectors Forensics Register" - Revolutionizing the Hobby

[jmk59]

Jay - I definitely agree that it works better if the database is strongly populated. But it has to start somewhere, IMO. Might as well here as anywhere.

And I don't know how the business model will go from a pricing standpoint - only that I see a big-picture value to the idea. I haven't looked at it closely enough to even understand and comment, really, but I will say offhand that it is easier for me to identify value to non-owners (as someone said, future owners, hobby watchdogs, maybe sellers, etc) than to current owners and targeted submitters.

Still an interesting idea if it can work.

J

[Leon]

I am sort of neutral about it and mostly fall into the "do I really need it?" camp. That being said I am also a bit concerned about Lloyd (he is the original poster) claiming over 100 yrs experience (collectively) in the hobby and having never heard of WIWAG, Operation Bullpen, CAC or GAI's issues. I am sort of wondering what hobby the experience is in unless they have 100 guys with 1 yr of experience each. I always applaud thinking of new things and outside of the box so I applaud them for the undertaking and wish them luck. Time will tell. best regards

[Peter_Spaeth]

I don't understand a company that touts their experience and doesn't tell you their NAMES.

[Anthony S.]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

I don't understand a company that touts their experience and doesn't tell you their NAMES.

It is odd that they answer other questions in such great detail, but continue to ignore every request that they identify themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_FZVD5lsAw

[Peter_Spaeth]

Daltrey could sing, couldn't he.

Funny I was thinking of the same song. Who the *&^% are you?????

[Collectors Forensics Reg]

Originally Posted by Anthony S.

It is odd that they answer other questions in such great detail, but continue to ignore every request that they identify themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_FZVD5lsAw

Just a quick note folks... yes, we have taken the time to entertain and answer the most appropriate questions in detail. We are very happy to do that. We have also touched on our backgrounds and how it applies to the service. In addition, we have a press release that is due out next week, which will be our official statement and will expand on my team and the service. It will be available on several PR sites and through a basic Google search.

We understand that this is all new to everyone and that the service may work for some but may not others. It may be an acquired taste or it may not be. You are all entitled to your opinions and that's great, we would have it no other way. Every product or service needs to be put to the test, ours is no different.

We do, however, need to ask that you please refrain from requesting our personal information - we will not post it here. An anonymous message board is an inappropriate forum for that discussion. The press release will cover everything to the extent that you need to know. I will post it to the CFReg.com web site when it becomes public.

Thanks,

Lloyd

[scooter729]

Originally Posted by Collectors Forensics Reg

Just a quick note folks... yes, we have taken the time to entertain and answer the most appropriate questions in detail. We are very happy to do that. We have also touched on our backgrounds and how it applies to the service. In addition, we have a press release that is due out next week, which will be our official statement and will expand on my team and the service. It will be available on several PR sites and through a basic Google search.

We understand that this is all new to everyone and that the service may work for some but may not others. It may be an acquired taste or it may not be. You are all entitled to your opinions and that's great, we would have it no other way. Every product or service needs to be put to the test, ours is no different.

We do, however, need to ask that you please refrain from requesting our personal information - we will not post it here. An anonymous message board is an inappropriate forum for that discussion. The press release will cover everything to the extent that you need to know. I will post it to the CFReg.com web site when it becomes public.

Thanks,

Lloyd

Hmmm, where have I seen before where posts are made by someone with a singular first name, but all posts refer to "we"? Just can't seem to place my finger on it...

[Al C.risafulli]

Can't seem to put OUR finger on it.

-Al(s)

[RobertGT]

As was stated, at least provide some hobby references. Many members on this board can provide hundreds if not thousands of references for past deals. How many do you have? Who can vouch for you? Why would anyone send a valuable card to some website when no one knows who you are?

It's the first step towards gaining a shred of credibility in this hobby.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by scooter729

Hmmm, where have I seen before where posts are made by someone with a singular first name, but all posts refer to "we"? Just can't seem to place my finger on it...

Nah! This clearly isn't him (them.) The spelling and grammar mistakes are too few and far between. These guys must have gone to a really good school.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Collectors Forensics Reg

We do, however, need to ask that you please refrain from requesting our personal information - we will not post it here. An anonymous message board is an inappropriate forum for that discussion.

Thanks,

Lloyd

You can ask us to refrain all you want, but the fact remains that most people on this board will NEVER do the kind of business you are asking for if we don't know who is behind the company. Most of us personally know the people behind the grading companies, the principals behind the auction houses, as well as each other. Many of us also know, or have known the names of people involved in the past scandals discussed.

The only new people in the equation are you guys. So please don't expect to be treated kindly until we do. (And, for the record, your replies so far have been just a little bit condescending.)

Also, please note that this is NOT "an anonymous message board." The people on here have all given personal info to Leon and the other mods. That info is available as needed to other board members. (Usually, only needed in threads that contain controversial posts. For example, if you say 1933 Goudey is your favorite set, you can be anonymous. If you say Dave Kohler of SCP is a scum and he cheated you out of $10,000, well, you'd have to give your name. Just an example.)

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

You can ask us to refrain all you want, but the fact remains that most people on this board will NEVER do the kind of business you are asking for if we don't know who is behind the company. Most of us personally know the people behind the grading companies, the principals behind the auction houses, as well as each other. Many of us also know, or have known the names of people involved in the past scandals discussed.

The only new people in the equation are you guys. So please don't expect to be treated kindly until we do. (And, for the record, your replies so far have been just a little bit condescending.)

Also, please note that this is NOT "an anonymous message board." The people on here have all given personal info to Leon and the other mods. That info is available as needed to other board members. (Usually, only needed in threads that contain controversial posts. For example, if you say 1933 Goudey is your favorite set, you can be anonymous. If you say Dave Kohler of SCP is a scum and he cheated you out of $10,000, well, you'd have to give your name. Just an example.)

I agree with every single word you just said Jim. I think there needs to be total transparency in this new REVOLUTION, not covertness and secretive behavior. Most of us have known each other, personally, for many years. And your points about anonymity vs privacy, with respect to the board, are spot on. Now, when are we going to finally do lunch? You know that You, Prizner, Rich K and myself really need to get together sometime. Rich and I have done lunch a hundred times and Prizner and I have gotten together around a dozen times. Heck, I would even have another get together at my house if you guys can make it? Take care now.....best regards

[Collectors Forensics Reg]

Originally Posted by Leon

I am sort of neutral about it and mostly fall into the "do I really need it?" camp. That being said I am also a bit concerned about Lloyd (he is the original poster) claiming over 100 yrs experience (collectively) in the hobby and having never heard of WIWAG, Operation Bullpen, CAC or GAI's issues. I am sort of wondering what hobby the experience is in unless they have 100 guys with 1 yr of experience each. I always applaud thinking of new things and outside of the box so I applaud them for the undertaking and wish them luck. Time will tell. best regards

Thanks for the post Leon. As we discussed the other day, fraud is fraud, no matter what flavor it comes in or what acronym that it's given (i.e. WIWAG). We record forensic properties of cards that are submitted to us for registration and facilitate their entry to the public record. Period. We take no position / make no judgement in grading company, quality or accuracy as stated previously. I'm sure that you understand why we can't come out and post about scandals. it's not our mission and nothing good can come from it. Apologies for the bluntness but this apparently needed to be clarified.

As for our experience in the hobby, the point was that we have been around a while and have seen a lot. We are simply responding to the issues as we best see fit. At the end of the day Leon, is providing an impartial forensic service and facilitating a central information register really congruent to the fact that the 1970 Donn Clendenon was my first baseball card ? :-)

[RobertGT]

I can see this service actually driving down the sale price of a graded card for several reasons:

- Most high-end graded card collectors are pretty picky about the condition/aesthetics of the TPG holder as well as the condition of the card itself. Attaching an ugly sticker to the reverse of the holder is a big turn-off, especially because it belongs to an anonymous start-up company that no one knows whether it will be around in one year from now.

- The company by its own admission will take no position on whether the card holder has been tampered with when they receive and evaluate it. It does nothing to eliminate fraud or detect bad holders, and perhaps may encourage scammers looking to add a layer of legitimacy to a fraudulent item. Service just takes a snapshot of whatever is submitted to them with no opinion whatsoever. It's laughable the service is touting fraud deterrence, when - as earlier posts indicate - the anonymous company officials are completely unaware of well-publicized scandals such as WIWAG, etc.

- Let's take a leap and say a few people use this service. I think most can agree its appeal is limited at best - perhaps for only some major high-end cards. So what about the rest of the mainstream collectors? When given a choice to buy a straight PSA 8 card that matches the rest of the cards in their set registry, or buy a PSA 8 card with some strange sticker on the back from an anonymous company that is only seen on 1 percent of all graded cards, which would they choose?

- For me, this is the equivalent of purchasing a 52 Topps Mantle RC in a PRO 8 holder.

[dstudeba]

Originally Posted by Collectors Forensics Reg

I'm sure that you understand why we can't come out and post about scandals. it's not our mission and nothing good can come from it. Apologies for the bluntness but this apparently needed to be clarified.

Please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand why you can't comment on public, well documented scandals. For someone who has supposednly been in the hobby long enough to start a business involving the hobby I would think they would know about WIWAG whatever acronym was used. Also your whole company is based on the existence of fraud and scandals, if it didn't exist, there would be no need for forensics.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by dstudeba

Please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand why you can't comment on public, well documented scandals. For someone who has supposednly been in the hobby long enough to start a business involving the hobby I would think they would know about WIWAG whatever acronym was used. Also your whole company is based on the existence of fraud and scandals, if it didn't exist, there would be no need for forensics.

Forget commenting. When Lloyd and I spoke on the phone he said he had NEVER heard about them. That was my issue....not the fact they will or won't comment, but they were ignorant of WIWAG, Operation Bullpen, CAC or any of the myriad issues with GAI. As I said...must be experience doing something else. It's certainly not in the hobby....or if it is, lets hear of this 100 yrs of experience. I will be glad to state my experience in the hobby, which isn't a ton but at least I know of those things mentioned above

[ChiefBenderForever]

The service might be good for a buyer but will cut into any sellers profits even more, this is going to be a very tough sell all around. I do wish you the best of luck, you have a long way to go, right now you are at the base of Niagara falls attempting to paddle up to the top, but atleast you are in a boat with a paddle.

[timzcardz]

Originally Posted by jmk59

Jay - I definitely agree that it works better if the database is strongly populated. But it has to start somewhere, IMO. Might as well here as anywhere.

J

That might not be entirely true.

Taking into consideration the failure rate of startup businesses, even in estabished market sectors, the viability of a new business type starting from scratch, as opposed to a new service being introduced by a financially established related business, seems questionable.

Will the company have the resources to survive until profitability is achieved?

If not, then all data is lost, along with the fees paid by individuals, unless an established company sees the viability and purchases the assets, that is, the data in the forms of images, etc., and carries it forward.