|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This may sound like a dumb question, but if that's the case couldn't he just rip a thin piece of paper off each corner of the Young and get a numerical grade then?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doug- it's actually a smart and obvious question.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And if you're doing the registry thing... you're probably not buying either.
__________________
Jim Van Brunt |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
You could do that and probably get a numerical grade. Its just like a psa 1 mk you can rip off the mk part of the back of a card and now get a psa 1 and the card looks much worse. Like Jim VB said at this end of the spectrum you are not necessarily going to get any more for an Authentic grade then a 1 2 or even 3 sometimes. Eye appeal definetly comes into play at that point.
Last edited by glynparson; 09-17-2010 at 09:44 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
The "A" grade has been used very subjectively, and in some cases, not at all. Not to derail, but it has always confused me why I couldn't even get an "A" grade for this OJ. If you look closely, someone very carefully cut out the "NY Giants" reference (just on the front, not cut through to the back) and glued on "Brooklyn" from another card. I have to imagine this was done in 1890, when he was with Brooklyn, since he went back to the Giants after that.
Why couldn't I get just an "A" for the card, just so I can have it protected in the slab? If they grade trimmed and otherwise altered cards, why not this? PSA and SGC both rejected this and said they wouldn't grade it.
Last edited by scooter729; 09-17-2010 at 11:06 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a tricky one Scott. That is technically two different cards glued together. I could see it creating a problem with authentication.
Last edited by barrysloate; 09-17-2010 at 11:07 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't the "restored" T206 Wagner technically two different cards glued together?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know what was done to that Wagner. I assumed the restoration had to do with inpainting. I will say that I don't think there is a consistent policy when it comes to encapsulating these unusual cards. There's a Just So of Jesse Burkett that is constructed from parts of two different cards and it is slabbed, but the label reads "altered." I guess the graders have to assess these on a card by card basis.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does Coaches Corner encapsulate cards? Maybe try there ; )
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The October auction could feature the signed OJ Ward! "Lee's great-grandfather got this signed outside the Polo Grounds himself! Valued at well into the thousands, we'll start it for $20!"
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diamond Stars Lopez; difference in #28 and #97 | Theoldprofessor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-30-2009 11:10 PM |
| Question on pricing difference between Piedmont & Sovereign | Chris D. | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-14-2009 12:38 PM |
| The difference between lucite holders and slabs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 05-09-2007 09:14 AM |
| Difference between SGC flips | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 01-09-2006 12:52 AM |
| Look at the difference in price | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-10-2004 05:16 PM |