![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1st, I should've defined what was considered the "deep South", as it was referred to back then....it included Alabama,
Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. There was lingering bitterness from the Civil War days by North- erners towards residents of these states. Look guys, I'm not making-up this Northern "predjudice" stuff. It is well documented; and, one of the more informative books on this is a biography of Connie Mack. I highly recommend it for those of you that enjoy reading in-depth stories about the various ballplayers in the T206 set....and, Joe Jackson's early days with the A's. And, thanks for coming up with a few more players, I was recalling research that I did years ago. Although, I'm surprised I forgot Stark and Street. Anyhow, adding your new inputs....Criss, Lavender, S. Smith, Stark, and Street....we have nine ballplayers from the deep South. This still just represents only 2.3 % of the 389 different subjects in the T206 set. You can dismiss this predjudice as a non-factor, that's your prerogative. But, it is what it is....and, I think it even played a role in the New York based ATC's decision to not include certain ballplayers from the deep South in their BB card sets. Of which, Shoeless Joe was the most notable. Was this predjudice also a factor when Kenesaw Mountain Landis banished Shoeless Joe from baseball ? From a US Air Force veteran, I wish you all a solemn Memorial Day. TED Z |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Here's the list I have for your deep south players: Alabama - Street and Fritz Georgia - Cobb, Rucker, Foster, Lavender, and McElveen. Louisiana - Oaks Mississippi - Criss and Stark South Carolina - Coles and S. Smith Of the players in the T206 set I have recorded the birth places of 341. Of those 341, 229 were born in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois or Massachusetts. That leaves 112 for the rest of the country of which the 12 above deep south players make up 10% As a comparison Georgia - 5 Kansas - 8 Kentucky - 8 Maryland - 8 New Jersey -7 Iowa - 7 Maine - 6 Texas - 6 Virginia - 5 Minnesota - 4 Nebraska - 3 Tennessee - 3 Oregon - 2 Washington - 2 West Virginia - 2 Vermont - 2 New Hampshire - 1 Rhode Island - 1 South Dakota - 1 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to follow your analysis, but I find it confusing. First of all, as you know, the T206 set comprises of 389 different
players. So, something isn't adding up with your numbers, please clarify. When we consider all 389, my math shows that only 11 (added Coles & Fritz) are from what was referred to as the deep South in the T206 era. That still is only 2.8 % of the set. Incidently, there are two Ed Foster's....one from Chicago and the other from Georgia....which one is in the T206 set ? And, I'm proud to say that Pennsylvania leads all the other states as the birthplace of the 389 guys in the T206 set. TED Z |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Ted,
I don't think anybody has listed all 389 T206 subjects by birth state so we may have incomplete information. Tim's research shows that a lot of states had poor representation in the T206 set. Almost all the major league franchises were in the NE and Midwest U.S. So it makes sense that most players are from those states. In that way, the owner 'magnates' were biased geographically. From my research, 1910 era players mercilessly made fun of players from the Deep South, but also rubes from farm towns, college boys, players who looked different, and players from other parts of the U.S. They were fighting to keep their jobs, and win games with mental warfare. Was there a bias against the Deep South? Yes. Ron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some years back, I researched all 389 (or is it 399) players in the T206 set. I am not about to type in all this info.
It looks like Tim has done the same. So, you are left to trust our data or check it out yourself. But, I have to differ with you regarding your.... "Almost all the major league franchises were in the NE and Midwest U.S. So it makes sense that most players are from those states." Back then, and over the years, there have been some great players from Texas and California. In California's case, it is very understandable, because of the PCL. Now, let's get back to Shoeless Joe. From the Connie Mack biography, that I alluded to in an earlier post, I'm paraphrasing some quotes with respect to Joe...... As a teenager, Joe was a ditch digger at the mills and developed powerful muscles. This translated into his powerful hits and the ability to throw a BB about 400 feet. According to Connie Mack, the sound of the crack of the bat when Joe hit the ball was something he had never heard of before. Connie Mack once said that Joe hit the longest HR that he ever saw, it traveled over 500 feet as it cleared the roof of the stadium. Connie Mack, who mainly recruited Collegians (Mack always contended that College coaching was better than any Minor Laegue coaching), had a lot of hope for Joe with the A's. However, Joe wouldn't "toe-the-line" with the A's policies and he hated being in the big city of Philly. TED Z |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
American Litho. (ALC) did not need to have....."new artwork commissioned " (to use your words).....regarding Joe Jax.
For, as we all know they had printed him in their 1910 OLD MILL (series 8) set. Therefore, it was a simple matter to re-use this image, and re-do his uniform and caption to reflect Cleveland in their subsequent T-card issues (T213, T214, T215). Indeed, ALC modified their T206 1909 images to produce subsequent cards in 1910 and 1911 for the following subjects...... G. Brown M. Brown Chance Chase Cobb Dahlen Demmitt Elberfeld Evers Kleinow Lundgren O'Hara F. Smith TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 05-31-2010 at 11:25 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
"American Litho did not repeat the T210 images in the other sets. The other sets repeated the T206 images including T210. All of the sets that utilized the T206 images will not include Joe Jackson. " |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Ted - Sorry my explanations are confusing. Feel free to call me anytime. I don't have recorded the birth places of all 389 players in the T206 set. To date I have 341 and used the information I do have, though incomplete, for my comparison. To compare the deep south states to the following would certainly seem like there was a bias. Pennsylvania - 67 Ohio - 48 New York - 43 Illinois - 27 But when you take those states out and compare the deep south to other parts of the country they have similar numbers that would show that the representation in the T206 set is not proof of bias. Was there bias against the south? Surely there was, but it isn't reflected in the number of representatives in the T206 set. The 12 players in the "deep south" group have 17 different cards in the set. Last edited by Abravefan11; 05-31-2010 at 09:47 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim - I agree with your posts here - I don't see Joe Jax being an intentional snub from T206 and therefore not from any of the later sets that re-used the T206 artwork - no player had new artwork commissioned for them for the later issues.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Post your favorite Honus Wagner card | Woundedduck | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 05-26-2010 06:36 AM |
WTB: 1930s-1990 Baseball Card Collections and Sets | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 01-13-2009 05:31 AM |
WTB: ANY JOE JACKSON CARD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 11-02-2008 05:07 AM |
How many people accept the T200 Cleveland card as their J. Jax card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 12-25-2007 11:04 AM |
Where was Joe Jax those early years (1908-10) ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 11-11-2007 08:51 PM |