![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hahaha. I like your sense of humor Johnny. I pulled this excerpt right out of that listing:
" A strong case can be made that the T206 Ty Cobb with "Ty Cobb" back should be assigned its own catalog number as a "one-card set," but due to its great similarity to the T206 series, this card has always been considered a T206." Heres what it should have said: " A strong case can be made that the T206 Ty Cobb with "Ty Cobb" back should be assigned its own catalog number as a "one-card set," unless its Chicago206 making that case. In that situation, he should be just disregarded as a newbie moron who knows nothing." |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Lol, it should say, "most everybody agrees it is a T206 although a few disagree, but really it doesn't matter because most of you will never own it anyways !! "
It is a T206, ATC was 100 years ahead of the game with it's own 1 or 1 ! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
we'll see about that johnny
![]() |
![]() |
|
|