Huggins and Scott winnings

[calvindog]

No, had a flowery description been included I'd still be bidding on the card.

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by calvindog

No, had a flowery description been included I'd still be bidding on the card.

Good job by you waiting for the second one to come around.

[bijoem]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Good job by you waiting for the second one to come around.

thats true!

I seem to remember a cool card was offered at auction.... then months later a second one --- a much nicer, SGC 84, came around and went for right around the same money as a crappy, ugly, can't hardly look at it, beater.

I can't remember which card it was though.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by bijoem

thats true!

I seem to remember of a cool card was offered at auction.... then months later a second one --- a much nicer, SGC 84, came around and went for right around the same money as a crappy, ugly, can't hardly look at it, beater.

I can't remember which card it was though.

I seem to recall the much nicer one going for 30% LESS that the ratty, beat up, one.

[calvindog]

Joe, do you remember when that second auction took place? If you can give me a date I might recall the card.

[bijoem]

Originally Posted by calvindog

Joe, do you remember when that second auction took place? If you can give me a date I might recall the card.

sorry - can't seem to remember the date.

wish I could - it would make it easier to figure out what card it was.

[calvindog]

Hmmm...keep thinking Joe. PS -- how cool is my new signature line?

___________________________________________

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by calvindog

Hmmm...keep thinking Joe. PS -- how cool is my new signature line?

___________________________________________

Personally? I'm offended by it! But that might be just me.