 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-31-2009, 10:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The easiest way to make sure it is not stamped is just to see if the ball has markings. They used generic baseballs without stamp markings for the souvenir balls (fit more signatures on them that way and also they used a much cheaper ball) so if a Baseball has any Official markings on it such as the league president stamp or the Reach logo etc, then it is not a stamped souvenir ball. Looks like original ink anyways I just thought I would throw that out there.
Last edited by prewarsports; 12-31-2009 at 10:16 AM. 
|
|
#2
12-31-2009, 12:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks to all that cleared that up for me!
The sigs just looked so similar & uniform and that partial J on Staley looked like it went right into the stitching, which is quite often the case on facsimile balls!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1924-25 Dominion Chocolate. Baseball cards DO exist! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-20-2012 09:15 PM |
| History of the 19th Century baseball to 1872 | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 04-23-2010 04:55 PM |
| Topps 1953 Baseball Compete Set -ending today | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-28-2009 11:04 PM |
| Miscellaneous Pre-War Baseball Publications F/S | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 07-23-2008 06:03 AM |
| Sports IIllusrtrated Reviews Smithsonian Baseball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-30-2005 02:31 PM |
Hybrid Mode
