 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-21-2009, 11:37 AM
|
||||
|
||||
my 2 cents
i agree it is logical to call it an e93...based on the cropping...and b/w...because it is. I guess it should have a numerical grade...but I also understand why they graded it A...as it is the 1st found of it's kind. Tough one...what does one do when a new discovery is made to the hobby. E97 b/w's were potentially mislabelled for years as proofs...maybe more of these will surface...or maybe these are proofs?!
|
|
#2
10-21-2009, 11:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is always a leap of faith with the first card out of the box...I would assume that down the road some new information will surface about it.
Now to label it an E93 doesn't SGC have to be nearly certain that this black and white example was printed ca. 1910? What if someone got hold of a printing plate, and at a later date made this? Wouldn't that preclude this being called an E93? We certainly don't know the origin of this card.
|
|
#3
10-21-2009, 11:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let me take it one step further. Shouldn't SGC be nearly certain that this example was printed ca. 1910 AND distributed by Standard Caramel for it to be labeled an E93?
As an example, E92s, E101s and E102s were all printed around the same time, and probably by the same printer, but are all different sets/issues because of how (and through whom) they were distributed.
|
|
#4
10-21-2009, 12:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
As I said Richard, SGC took a leap of faith. It very well may be exactly what the label says, but we don't know for sure.
|
|
#5
10-21-2009, 12:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which it means it very well may not be what the label says.
Quote:
|
|
#6
10-21-2009, 03:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
images taken from ebay and the board-it appeares the image is from the e93 issue
e93TyCobb[1].jpg!BToghj!BWk~$(KGrHgoOKj!EjlLm,WqpBKJdmjz3U!~~_12[1].jpg10COBB384[1].jpg
__________________
T206Resource.com Last edited by cfc1909; 10-21-2009 at 03:10 PM.
|
|
#7
10-21-2009, 03:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I honestly don't think it matters if the card has a numerical grade or not. The card isn't going to sell because of its grade, its going to sell because its a one of a kind card. (Maybe) If another one comes out into the open and SGC gives it a numerical grade, then yeah this one should get one too. I get what you guys are saying that if some E-UNC cards get numerical grades then this one should, but I don't think that it matters if it has a numerical grade or not.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: E95 Cobb or Plank, or E102 Cobb (standing), E90-1 Speaker or Young, E93 Matty | Kotton King | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-11-2009 09:44 AM |
| wtt: e95 cobb for e93 cobb | chaddurbin | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 07-07-2009 04:54 AM |
| T205 Matty PSA3, e93 Cobb and more just posted to ebay with BINs | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-31-2006 10:11 AM |
| E93 WAGNER PSA 7, 1914 CJ COBB PSA 4 FOR SALE | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 05-15-2005 06:31 PM |
| wanted: t209 contentea's color and black & white | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-29-2001 04:56 PM |
Hybrid Mode
