 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
08-19-2009, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I agree that once the ball leaves Dick's hands all bets are off as to seller disclosure. I have a proposal that might help mitigate the damage.
We all know that major league baseball puts a special marking on baseballs when a major record is imminent (Barry Bonds HRs, for example) in order to validate the authenticity of a ball caught by a fan. It can be very unobtrusive; it might even be invisible to the eye but visible under the blacklight. I don't know if it's a hologram, but whatever it is...it works. I wonder if Dick would consider "marking his territory" via such a marking that wouldn't interfere with the display of the refined baseball, but nevertheless would stand as a permanent way of identifying that work was done? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Companion Pieces - ink blotters and E94 envelope | rman444 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-25-2009 09:09 AM |
| question on diamond star back ink | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-26-2008 11:25 PM |
| Autographed HOF baseballs FS each with HOF Year Inscribed | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 2 | 09-21-2007 07:42 PM |
| Ink Bleed on Back of '33 Goudey? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-11-2007 06:19 PM |
| Possibly unique E94 missing ink error-Taking Offers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 05-07-2006 05:09 PM |
Threaded Mode