![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given all the credible questions raised about the PSA 8 Wagner and that it remains PSA's signature item, IMO the proper thing to do is to re-grade it according PSA's current standards. If if fact it does not exhibit such signs suggesting it was after-the-fact cut from a sheet (and then subsequently possibly trimmed), it can be re-slabbed with an appropriate numerical grade. If though it exhibits such characteristics that would cause PSA to grade as an "A" another currently submitted card with identical characteristics, then it should be given an "A". This approach makes moot what did or did not happen in the past and evaluates the card based on factual criteria.
Oh, and right, like I really think this is going to happen. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Honus Wagner with Tolstoi back (PSA graded) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-11-2008 12:09 AM |
How many people have a t206 honus wagner? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-10-2007 12:42 PM |
t206 honus wagner psa 2 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 22 | 05-26-2007 05:22 AM |
Honus Wagner Cards -- No T206 Please | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 37 | 01-23-2006 11:00 AM |
1910 E91-C Honus Wagner card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-20-2004 01:40 PM |