 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-05-2009, 07:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think this could possibly get more interesting.
And if, as Doug says, they did everything legally and the obligations of Mastro remain with Mastro, then why is he still involved in making arrangements and trying to pay off Mastro consignors and saying that Legendary wanted to get the Mastro business wrapped up as quickly as they could? Which is it? If the debts are legally not Legendary's, as they claim, then why the ongoing involvement in those payments? Go back to Adam's post above about personal liability. That's the only context in which this makes sense. J 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970-71 Dayton Daily News cards | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 05-28-2008 10:12 AM |
| Vintage Press Photos from Daily News Yankees, Mets and Dodgers | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 03-29-2008 10:03 AM |
| Article in 2/19 NY Daily News about UD controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-22-2006 09:18 AM |
| NY Daily News Artcile | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 66 | 01-22-2005 01:30 AM |
| Today's Origins of the Game Article (ESPN.com) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-11-2004 05:04 PM |
Hybrid Mode
