|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Rob Dewolf
It goes without saying that "you're all winners." That being said, did anyone pick up some prizes from Goodwin's auction last night? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Mark T
?t=1196438590 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: BcD
http://www.psacard.com/set_registry/display_cards.chtml?rsetid=84357&alltime=no&rank=4&tied=0&requesttimeout=9999 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
I managed to pick up the last card I needed(62T Witt 287) in psa 8 to complete my 1960-68 Topps run in psa 8 or better. Paying $7,500 for the two toughest commons in this set was something I questioned doing but someitimes you just have to pay up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- I thought you swore off auctions? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Eric
I picked up the three low grad N172 Old Judge's |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
Barry, |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
I wish I had the luxury of calling two commons for $7500 lower priced cards. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: jeffdrum
Barry, |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: leon
Has Kevin S approved these yet? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: James Feagin
Jim, |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
Certainly for star cards or cards over a certain price but for lower price cards where it is the only way I can get the card then I will bid. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
Leon, Greg |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- I'm with Greg on this one. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: jeffdrum
What's the difference in pre-45 and post-50? Have you deemed one much more susceptible to hanky panky? WOuldn't all sets where the registry is @ play be equally susceptible to chicanery? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
Barry, |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
My point is you said numerous times that you would no longer participate in auctions. My response is auctions are a perfectly good avenue to obtain cards and they need not be boycotted. That's all. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JK
BCD - |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Anonymous
the two toughest commons in this set |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: cmoking
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimB
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Rob Dewolf
Nice job, JimB. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
JimB, |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
Jim- you have emphatically said on numerous occasions you will not buy from auction houses any more. Personally, I don't care who you buy from, but I am not misstating your words. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
There are a number of prices for star cards in this auction that make absolutely no sense to me. For starters, $1200 for an ugly 62 Topps Spahn 8, a card that according to VCP has sold for an average of $150? Over $3000 for a 62 Koufax 8, a nice one granted, but still. Close to $400 for a 65 Topps Banks 8, a card that is incredibly easy to find for $150 or less? What a great racket this auction biz is. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
"on numerous occasions" |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: barrysloate
Well Jim, I don't have the computer skills to find your old posts, so you win this battle by default. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Brad
Up Grade! |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: marty quinn
decided last second not to go for the 34 green gehrig psa 7, sorry i did, on another note....for all of you that got the catalog, lot #1 the tim keefe psa 8, is it me or does the corners look slightly rounded on at least 3 of them??? the more i look the more they do look rounded, if so a psa 8??? holy cow...did anybody see this card in person? |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
I think anyone who pays that much for a common is insane!! Jim, I suspect you would agree, but congrats on completing your set. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Paul S
I'm still trying to figure out what makes the 62T Witt and Landrum so tough. Is it just a current scarcity? (I don't have any recent sales data).They are listed among the least expensive in the SCD; no short print, no high series. I know 62T's edges easily show wear, but still...[scratches head in bewilderment] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Paul
I'm wondering who picked up the E125 Clarke. It seems like a real steal to me at about $800, considering the last one sold for $8,000 in REAs auction. This one was missing one of the tabs, but a 10-fold difference when only two copies are known seems a bit extreme. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: T206Collector
I don't really have the time to do all the research necessitated by the challenge, but I believe Barry was referring to comments like this one: |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Don't try to figure out why Witt, Landrum, or any other normally available common in the 1962 Topps |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Ted, respectfully I don't think you are entirely right here, there has been enough demand for commons for enough years now that I believe the pop reports are at least somewhat indicative of the difficulty of finding certain commons in NM/MT and MT condition, rather than just a fortuity. My guess is that the issue for all these difficult commons that are not short prints is something to do with sheet placement. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Respectfully, I cannot agree with your premise regarding......"there has been enough demand for |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
If these existed in high grade, there is a HUGE incentive for dealers and collectors to submit them because of the crazy money they bring. So assuming even a semi efficient market over a long period of time, there just has to be significance to the fact that certain cards remain relatively scarce in the pop reports. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
Lot 725 1962 Topps Maris/Cepeda PSA 8. Nothing rare about it as far as I know, and one just sold on ebay for 168 bucks. Goes in Goodwin for FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
Now, here you make a very good point..... |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
Abner, |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Peter_Spaeth
I agree with you, and I did not mean to suggest for example that a pop 2 would stay that way forever, only that I think enough data and incentive exist so that it says SOMETHING about relative scarcity if a really low pop still exists and that it is not just a random occurrence. I have stated before I do not think low pop PSA 8 commons are good investments precisely because others WILL come along. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Steve Clark
Peter again brings a great example of this craziness. One has to wonder whether $5k for the Maris/Cepeda is legitimate considering what one could buy the card on eBay for, don't you think? |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: JimCrandell
Pops are a great measure of relative scarcity. Sure they can change but enough cards have been graded so that the low pops of today will generally be the low pops of tomorrow and continue to command a significant premium over other cards in the set. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Eric Brehm
Forgive the post-war digression, but that was a real exceptional 1962 Topps PSA 8 set that Goodwin sold. The cards looked like they were pulled straight out of packs. Most had near perfect centering too. Whoever put that set together really had a good eye for quality. That's the only explanation I can see as to why those cards did so well in the auction. Most of the star and rookie cards brought 2X to 5X SMR value, or higher. And the scarce commons and starter lots all brought very strong prices as well. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Marc S.
across the board, although the 1915 CJ Alexander PSA 7 went for less than I thought it would. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Frank Evanov
I would say the top card looks more like an 8 to me. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
Way too much chipping around the edges of the bottom card for it to be an 8. The top one must be the 8. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Jeff Lichtman
Mark, I hope the top one is the 8. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Goodwin pick-ups
Posted By: Steve Murray
the top one "should" be the 8 but I fear we may be wrong. If so |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
April Pick Ups | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 27 | 04-22-2009 09:28 AM |
Second January Pick Ups- | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 48 | 02-02-2009 07:20 PM |
National pick ups!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 69 | 08-07-2008 03:46 PM |
Summer pick ups; | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 4 | 07-02-2008 01:37 PM |
recent pick ups | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 09-02-2005 07:36 PM |