Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Goodwin pick-ups (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=87908)

Archive 12-01-2007 08:01 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Rob Dewolf</b><p>It goes without saying that "you're all winners." That being said, did anyone pick up some prizes from Goodwin's auction last night?<br /><br />Ironically, I got a Nap and also will need one later, thanks to the nearly 5 a.m. ending time of the auction.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotImages/003_Lot49a_med.jpeg">

Archive 12-01-2007 08:04 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Mark T</b><p><img src="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x198/SquareframeRamly/M116THOMAS.jpg">?t=1196438590<br /><br /><img src="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x198/SquareframeRamly/M116TENNEY.jpg">?t=1196438604<br /><br /><img src="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x198/SquareframeRamly/M116LORD.jpg">?t=1196438619<br /><br /><img src="http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x198/SquareframeRamly/M116JORDAN.jpg">?t=1196438634

Archive 12-01-2007 08:40 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>BcD</b><p><a href="http://www.psacard.com/set_registry/display_cards.chtml?rsetid=84357&alltime=no&rank=4 &tied=0&requesttimeout=9999" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.psacard.com/set_registry/display_cards.chtml?rsetid=84357&alltime=no&rank=4 &tied=0&requesttimeout=9999</a><br /><br />I know JK bid on it! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br><br>BcD <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive 12-01-2007 09:26 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>I managed to pick up the last card I needed(62T Witt 287) in psa 8 to complete my 1960-68 Topps run in psa 8 or better. Paying $7,500 for the two toughest commons in this set was something I questioned doing but someitimes you just have to pay up.<br /><br />Jim

Archive 12-01-2007 09:29 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Jim- I thought you swore off auctions?

Archive 12-01-2007 09:34 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Eric</b><p>I picked up the three low grad N172 Old Judge's<br /><br />ARLIE LATHAM - PSA 3<br />FRED PFEFFER - PSA 2<br />PATSY TEBEAU - PSA 2<br /><br />Very happy with the purchase!

Archive 12-01-2007 09:35 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Barry,<br /><br />Certainly for star cards or cards over a certain price but for lower price cards where it is the only way I can get the card then I will bid.

Archive 12-01-2007 10:15 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>I wish I had the luxury of calling two commons for $7500 lower priced cards.

Archive 12-01-2007 10:37 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>jeffdrum</b><p>Barry,<br />I had the same reaction when I read Jim's follow up post. Certainly gives me a different perspective on lower priced cards. In any event, Jim congrats on reaching the end of this quest!

Archive 12-01-2007 10:39 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>Has Kevin S approved these yet?

Archive 12-01-2007 10:50 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>James Feagin</b><p>Jim,<br /><br />I was going to bid on one of those cards, but I was pretty sure it was trimmed, so I stayed away. Best of luck though!<br /><br />James

Archive 12-01-2007 10:58 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Bottom of the Ninth</b><p>Certainly for star cards or cards over a certain price but for lower price cards where it is the only way I can get the card then I will bid.<br /><br />The above post by Jim illustrates exactly why the hobby will never be "cleaned" up as Jim would like it. Not saying Jim should not have bought the card but given his adamant new stance on buying, it took less than 2 weeks before he made a concession and deviated from his plan. <br /><br />My point being that the desire to acquire and collect always seems to be larger than that which drives our principles. Congrats to Jim on his set run. And yes those holders can get expensive.<br /><br />Greg

Archive 12-01-2007 11:05 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Leon, Greg<br /><br />As you will recall I said I would not buy any card over $10K without having it looked at by Kevin. I was not referring to commons from the 1960s that I need to finish my sets.<br /><br />I am referring to stuff like 33 Goudey Ruth psa 8s, or 34-6 Diamond Star card #1 etc.

Archive 12-01-2007 11:12 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Jim- I'm with Greg on this one.<br /><br />I think it's poor form to speak so disparagingly about auction houses, and their refusal to offer refunds, and then come on the board to say you just bought a multi-thousand dollar card from Goodwin. You're free to buy it, and to enjoy it, but I would have kept that one under my hat.<br /><br />Didn't you foresee the can of worms it would open?<br />

Archive 12-01-2007 11:14 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>jeffdrum</b><p>What's the difference in pre-45 and post-50? Have you deemed one much more susceptible to hanky panky? WOuldn't all sets where the registry is @ play be equally susceptible to chicanery?

Archive 12-01-2007 11:29 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Barry,<br /><br />No--I said that any card over $10K I would send in to Kevin. Also send I would try to avoid auction houses. Don't see your point. Hard to avoid them all together if you are trying to build over 100 sets in psa 8 or better.

Archive 12-01-2007 12:30 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>My point is you said numerous times that you would no longer participate in auctions. My response is auctions are a perfectly good avenue to obtain cards and they need not be boycotted. That's all.

Archive 12-01-2007 12:48 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JK</b><p>BCD - <br /><br />Its a beauty - but what makes you think I was bidding <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive 12-01-2007 12:57 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Anonymous</b><p><i>the two toughest commons in this set</i><br /><br />Apologies for being slightly OT but besides Witt, what is the other tough card? It's been so long since I collected these that it's probably worth my while to unclip mine out of the spokes!

Archive 12-01-2007 01:17 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>cmoking</b><p><img src="http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotImages/003_Lot634a_med.jpeg"> <img src="http://www.goodwinandco.com/LotImages/003_Lot48a_med.jpeg">

Archive 12-01-2007 01:46 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p><br />JimCrandall said,<br />"In fact probably any card I buy over $5,000 that I have a doubt about I would have the sale contingent upon Kevin's seal of approval."<br /><br />Well either his $ number went up to $10,000 for requiring Kevin's services, or he now has greater trust in auction houses than a few weeks ago.<br />JimB

Archive 12-01-2007 02:05 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Rob Dewolf</b><p>Nice job, JimB.<br /><br />Barnaby Jones-like.

Archive 12-01-2007 02:30 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>JimB,<br /><br />Whoops--I meant $5,000--<br /><br />Thank you for pointing that out.<br /><br />Abner,<br /><br />The other ultra tough one is Don Landrum.<br /><br />Barry,<br /><br />Are you sure I said that "numerous" times--I am trying not to buy cards from auctions. You tend to be a little loose around what I have said in the past. My recollection is I am trying to buy my high dollar cards directly from dealers and that is a preferable business model for me as I have the flexibility to have them reviewed by an expert.

Archive 12-01-2007 02:36 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Jeff Lichtman</b><p><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1196462099.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1196462148.JPG">

Archive 12-01-2007 02:44 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Jim- you have emphatically said on numerous occasions you will not buy from auction houses any more. Personally, I don't care who you buy from, but I am not misstating your words.

Archive 12-01-2007 03:01 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>There are a number of prices for star cards in this auction that make absolutely no sense to me. For starters, $1200 for an ugly 62 Topps Spahn 8, a card that according to VCP has sold for an average of $150? Over $3000 for a 62 Koufax 8, a nice one granted, but still. Close to $400 for a 65 Topps Banks 8, a card that is incredibly easy to find for $150 or less? What a great racket this auction biz is.

Archive 12-01-2007 03:21 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>"on numerous occasions" <br /><br />Prove me wrong Barry and I will be the first to admit it--otherwise admit that once again you are misstating what I have said.

Archive 12-01-2007 03:52 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Well Jim, I don't have the computer skills to find your old posts, so you win this battle by default. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14><br /><br />Perhaps someone else can find them.

Archive 12-01-2007 04:00 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Brad</b><p>Up Grade!<br /><img src="http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j136/MapleCrispetteV117/123456.jpg">

Archive 12-01-2007 04:16 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>marty quinn</b><p>decided last second not to go for the 34 green gehrig psa 7, sorry i did, on another note....for all of you that got the catalog, lot #1 the tim keefe psa 8, is it me or does the corners look slightly rounded on at least 3 of them??? the more i look the more they do look rounded, if so a psa 8??? holy cow...did anybody see this card in person? <br /> with respect to goodwin i did not view it on-line, maybe it is much better than the cat. picture, sure hope so...

Archive 12-01-2007 04:22 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>I think anyone who pays that much for a common is insane!! <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> Jim, I suspect you would agree, but congrats on completing your set.

Archive 12-01-2007 04:29 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p>I'm still trying to figure out what makes the 62T Witt and Landrum so tough. Is it just a current scarcity? (I don't have any recent sales data).They are listed among the least expensive in the SCD; no short print, no high series. I know 62T's edges easily show wear, but still...<i>[scratches head in bewilderment]</i>

Archive 12-01-2007 05:21 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>I'm wondering who picked up the E125 Clarke. It seems like a real steal to me at about $800, considering the last one sold for $8,000 in REAs auction. This one was missing one of the tabs, but a 10-fold difference when only two copies are known seems a bit extreme.<br /><br />I thought long and hard about buying it, but decided it just wasn't a priority for me even if it seemed like a good deal.

Archive 12-01-2007 05:44 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>T206Collector</b><p>I don't really have the time to do all the research necessitated by the challenge, but I believe Barry was referring to comments like this one:<br /><br />"I realize auction houses are not set up to operate like this at the present time so it makes me unlikely to buy cards sight unseen at auctions."<br /><br />From this thread:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/message/1195335892/last-1195399429/Re-+www.AlteredCards.com" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.network54.com/Forum/153652/message/1195335892/last-1195399429/Re-+www.AlteredCards.com</a><br /><br />It's not really a big feal, but it's just that JimC's behavior tends to bely his own convictions about reforming the hobby (e.g., not having his current collection reviewed, only new pickups; not having these new pickups reviewed; continuing to use auction houses, etc.). Frankly, I could care less how JimC collects, but while he's on his soap box he might want to act a little bit more like he preaches. <br /><br />

Archive 12-01-2007 06:13 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Ted Zanidakis</b><p>Don't try to figure out why Witt, Landrum, or any other normally available common in the 1962 Topps<br /> set are garnering such ridiculous $$$$. All it is, is a figment of those who "live & die" by POP #'s.<br /><br />These cards are perfect examples of how the POP #'s tend mislead when it comes to COMMON cards,<br /> whether they are 1962 Topps or T206's. Common sense will tell anyone who cares to apply it.....why<br /> such cards have Low POP #'s. Most Collectors/Investors don't give a crap for many of the commons<br /> in a given set. The majority of the cards they submit for grading are stars and HOFers. The commons<br /> fall by the wayside....hence, a lot of them invariably have Low POP's. But, that does NOT really make<br /> them scarce.<br /><br />I've put together 2 complete 1962 Topps sets....one in Ex condition, and a 2nd one in NrMt condition.<br />And, I never found any card in this set that scarce or unavailable that I would pay "big bucks" for it.<br /><br />T-Rex TED

Archive 12-01-2007 06:21 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>Ted, respectfully I don't think you are entirely right here, there has been enough demand for commons for enough years now that I believe the pop reports are at least somewhat indicative of the difficulty of finding certain commons in NM/MT and MT condition, rather than just a fortuity. My guess is that the issue for all these difficult commons that are not short prints is something to do with sheet placement.

Archive 12-01-2007 07:05 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Ted Zanidakis</b><p>Respectfully, I cannot agree with your premise regarding......"there has been enough demand for<br /> commons for enough years now that I believe the pop reports are at least somewhat indicative<br /> of the difficulty....".<br />The demand for HOFers and Stars far outweighs the demand for Commons. Especially, in this cur-<br />rent environment. The type collectors far out-number the set collectors (in the 1980's and early<br /> '90s the converse was true). This is so, nowadays, because of the prohibitive cost involved in <br />putting together a complete set.<br /><br />Having said that I completed two 62T sets, believe me there was no difficulty in finding these 2<br /> cards. Furthermore, being a dealer now for 26 years I have bought and sold 1000's of 62T cards<br /> and have helped collectors complete their sets. And, these two cards never raised any "red flags"<br /> on their wantlists.<br /><br />Regarding placement of cards on their uncut sheets, I happen to also collect uncut sheets. I have<br /> pre-war W-type, Leaf, many Bowman, Topps, and Fleer uncut sheets. I don't have a 62T sheet; <br />however, I have seen several Low # uncut sheets of this set. And, there are no situations where<br /> any of these cards were subject to even minor damage.<br /><br />TED Z<br />

Archive 12-01-2007 07:16 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>If these existed in high grade, there is a HUGE incentive for dealers and collectors to submit them because of the crazy money they bring. So assuming even a semi efficient market over a long period of time, there just has to be significance to the fact that certain cards remain relatively scarce in the pop reports.

Archive 12-01-2007 07:24 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>Lot 725 1962 Topps Maris/Cepeda PSA 8. Nothing rare about it as far as I know, and one just sold on ebay for 168 bucks. Goes in Goodwin for FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS.<br /><br /><a href="http://goodwinandco.com/LotDetail2.aspx?lotid=3293" target="_new" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://goodwinandco.com/LotDetail2.aspx?lotid=3293</a" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://goodwinandco.com/LotDetail2.aspx?lotid=3293</a</a>><br /><br /><br />EDIT TO ADD link to ebay auction:<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1962-Topps-Roger-Maris-AL-NL-Homer-Kings-401-PSA-8_W0QQitemZ290186240094QQihZ019QQcategoryZ55922QQs sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1962-Topps-Roger-Maris-AL-NL-Homer-Kings-401-PSA-8_W0QQitemZ290186240094QQihZ019QQcategoryZ55922QQs sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a>

Archive 12-01-2007 08:05 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Ted Zanidakis</b><p>Now, here you make a very good point.....<br />"If these existed in high grade, there is a HUGE incentive for dealers and collectors to submit them <br />because of the crazy money they bring."<br /><br />Studying the POP reports in the past 2 years, I have seen a trend where high-end Commons seem<br /> to be "coming out of the woodwork". And, as you say the incentive is there if there are "big $$$$"<br /> to be made, more of these Commons will start showing up on the POP report.<br /><br />I've been downgrading some of sets where I have common cards that I think will grade high. And,<br /> replace them with Ex cards. I'm no fool, I will take advantage of this "crazy" market while it lasts.<br /><br />But obviously, the problem that results is.....say a particular high-end card has been identified in<br /> the POP report is as one of a kind. Inevitably, 1 or 2 more of this card will eventually come out of<br /> the woodwork and grade the same. The poor sucker that paid those big bucks is screwed. But, as<br /> I said you can "live or die" by these POP #'s.....it's a risky game, at best.<br /><br />TED Z <br />

Archive 12-01-2007 08:09 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Abner,<br /><br />The Landrum and Witt are worth what they are because they are legitimately scarce in high grade. If anyone had a nrmt-mt example they would send it in. The toughest 2 cards of any of the Topps sets in the 1960s.<br /><br />As I have said before the price of cards is all about the pops.

Archive 12-01-2007 08:11 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>I agree with you, and I did not mean to suggest for example that a pop 2 would stay that way forever, only that I think enough data and incentive exist so that it says SOMETHING about relative scarcity if a really low pop still exists and that it is not just a random occurrence. I have stated before I do not think low pop PSA 8 commons are good investments precisely because others WILL come along.

Archive 12-01-2007 08:16 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Clark</b><p>Peter again brings a great example of this craziness. One has to wonder whether $5k for the Maris/Cepeda is legitimate considering what one could buy the card on eBay for, don't you think?

Archive 12-01-2007 08:40 PM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>JimCrandell</b><p>Pops are a great measure of relative scarcity. Sure they can change but enough cards have been graded so that the low pops of today will generally be the low pops of tomorrow and continue to command a significant premium over other cards in the set.

Archive 12-02-2007 06:51 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Eric Brehm</b><p>Forgive the post-war digression, but that was a real exceptional 1962 Topps PSA 8 set that Goodwin sold. The cards looked like they were pulled straight out of packs. Most had near perfect centering too. Whoever put that set together really had a good eye for quality. That's the only explanation I can see as to why those cards did so well in the auction. Most of the star and rookie cards brought 2X to 5X SMR value, or higher. And the scarce commons and starter lots all brought very strong prices as well.<br /><br />The Maris/Cepeda card that Peter S. pointed out sold for over $5000 is hard to fathom. VCP shows eight sales of that card in PSA 8 in the last 13 months at an average price of $171.33. (SMR value is $175.) The card is offered frequently for sale at about book price -- so why would bidders want to run up the price for this particular one like that? Just one of those crazy things that happens in auctions once in a while, I suppose.<br /><br />Does anyone have a feel for how the pre-war material (e.g. T3's, Cracker Jacks, M116's) did in the Goodwin auction, generally speaking, price-wise? <br /><br /><br /><br />

Archive 12-02-2007 09:26 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Marc S.</b><p>across the board, although the 1915 CJ Alexander PSA 7 went for less than I thought it would.<br /><br /><br />Here's my only comment on the 1962 Witt. Attached below are two scans of a 1962 Witt card. One is a PSA 7, one is a PSA 8. The price difference between the two is approximately $2,900. Although the scans were made by different people (and thus the color is off), I have endeavoured to make the sizes precisely the same, and have cropped out the flips. Can anyone tell me with 100% certainty (without checking Goodwin's website) which one is the PSA 8?<br /><br />Marc<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1196529925.JPG"> <br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1196529915.JPG">

Archive 12-02-2007 09:30 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Frank Evanov</b><p>I would say the top card looks more like an 8 to me.<br><br>Frank

Archive 12-02-2007 09:57 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Al C.risafulli</b><p>Way too much chipping around the edges of the bottom card for it to be an 8. The top one must be the 8.<br /><br />-Al

Archive 12-02-2007 10:00 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Jeff Lichtman</b><p>Mark, I hope the top one is the 8.

Archive 12-02-2007 10:00 AM

Goodwin pick-ups
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>the top one "should" be the 8 but I fear we may be wrong. If so <img src="/images/sad.gif" height=14 width=14>


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.