 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16
07-26-2007, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Which of these sets should I dabble with?
Posted By: Dave F
Joe, I would have agreed with you until I actually received the Ramly in hand. It's the first I've ever actually had in front of me...and to be honest it made quite the impression...from all the scans I've ever seen I'd agree it didn't look that attractive to me. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The top 10 sets? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-02-2008 12:40 PM |
| FS Bowman Sets 50,52,54 and 55 and more | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-06-2008 10:11 AM |
| sets started..sets finished...sets discarded | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-09-2007 11:50 AM |
| several complete sets and starter sets from 1955 - 1970 available | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-09-2007 10:14 PM |
| Sets vs. Singles | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 10-26-2005 01:19 AM |
Threaded Mode