![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve M.
Not only was there a slight paper loss there was some slight paste residue as well. My experince with SGC is don't expect more than a 10 if you have paper loss or paste residue. The front really won't help you. With that being said I personally don't know why we get so hung up on the backs. "Ohhhhhh, the back is a little OC, ergo it is not acceptable". Come on now! |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC grading submission.....opinions? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 07-18-2008 08:13 AM |
Grading question, all opinions welcome. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-16-2008 06:14 PM |
Opinions on Professional Grading Services | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-08-2006 09:54 PM |
Opinions on sending cards in for Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-09-2004 03:28 PM |
Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |