![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Andy--what I was stating was both my opinion and one conveyed to me by Barry Sloate. I would suggest that you call Barry, or Lew Lipset for that matter, and get their view directly. I'm sure that they will verify that the trade card is generally believed to be more desireable than the CdV. However, I do agree that we have taken this discussion farther than it needs to go. They are both great cards; I think we can both agree on that. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2008 HOF class | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 11 | 04-25-2008 07:04 PM |
Baseball cards as an asset class | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 104 | 09-03-2007 07:05 PM |
A Class Act in Cards, Just Not Baseball | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-21-2007 10:22 PM |
First Class HOF Grand Slam type card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 12-17-2005 11:34 AM |
The new Card HOF class | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-28-2004 07:08 PM |