 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-19-2002, 08:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners?
Posted By: warshawlaw
Like it or not, there are legitimate size variations. I collect boxing T cards and I have several that are larger than the average. Most show excessive wear on a border, as though it had been sticking up over the edge of a stack. I also have seen quite a few obviously trimmed T cards that were probably cut down from oversized cards by some kid long ago. Unfortunately, when you get down to millimeters on items that were really throw-aways when they were made, you are going to find variations. 
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| e91-c, card size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-21-2006 07:22 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 10:48 AM |
| now you see it now it's smaller- scan size | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-16-2006 09:10 AM |
| smaller card toploaders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2005 03:36 AM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 09:40 PM |
Hybrid Mode
