 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-14-2001, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Card Size Variation
Posted By: Elliot (pro9)
I've got a theory on why some issues have a very consistent card size (such as t206) while others have significant variation. Issues that have crop marks on the sheets should have a consistent size, as the crop marks were also used when cutting with the guillotine, while those without crop marks would not. Thus, if the proofs from an issue did not have crop marks, it would stand to reason that neither would the sheets and the size could have a large variation. Similiarly, the t206 proofs do have crop marks, and the issue has a consistent size. Thoughts??? 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E97 Steinfeldt variation card SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 09-22-2008 07:28 PM |
| 1974 Topps Braves team card variation | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 09-01-2008 06:26 PM |
| ca. 1927 Tabacalera La Morena Ruth & Gehrig card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-27-2008 08:08 AM |
| Size of Diamond Star Robert Rolfe Card... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-24-2007 03:17 AM |
| Goudey Card Size tolerance? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-12-2006 08:36 AM |
Hybrid Mode
