![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If SGC goes away, I’ll stop getting cards graded because I just can’t stomach. the idea of giving PSA one dime.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
And what kind of discount do people think they'd get on SGC slabbed cards if SGC went away?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Me neither. CSG!!
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Iceberg! straight ahead!
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life" John 3:16 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
But maybe it feels less icky if your credit card statement says SGC instead of saying PSA?
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From what I remember hearing this has not happened because PSA will not cross SGC Cards over as same grade.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does never get cheated apply to monopolies?
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think PSA graders and their reviewers are trained to NOT follow the published grading standards listed on their web site. i recently tried to recently crossover 9 conservatively graded prewar and postwar vintage to PSA w/ the cards still in their SGC holders (+ two easy SGC 1s). so 11 in total. yes, i know this was a moronic move but wasted money anyway. it went worse than expected. i went f'in 9 for 11. it was a joke. nothing crossed over except my 2 SGC 1s which were simple. i showed one or two examples on my interview last month w/ John Newman if you want to see the SGC 2 1938 Joe DiMaggio. When i opened a case for that Joe D, it was automatically closed w/ this company line , "PSA is an educated opinion-based service, and sometimes, these opinions may not be agreed with. I know how important it is for your cards to reach their full potential while undergoing the grading process with us. Two graders look at the card, one of whom is a senior grader. They come to an agreement on the card's final grade. If you want the card looked at again, it must be submitted for a full review and crossover service. We will not provide a pre-paid label. I am sorry we can’t do more for you. ". the psa support reps didn't even case both cards' grader notes supported the cards being crossed over w/ my min required grade (2 - good). they didn't care their published grading standard for the "good condition" matched the grader notes my other customer support case was closed with very similar wording. so I agree with Johnny that PSA will not crossover SGC slabs using the 1 to 1 direct grade. they will likely offer a discount to crossover along while asking us to bend over w/ taking the undeserved lower grade. why? because they can (& the history repeats itself) and they have that card guarantee in-place which is is a $ headache to them Last edited by tjisonline; 05-01-2025 at 09:37 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good Bye SGC! It was nice knowing you!
__________________
Successful Transactions with Neal, RGold, Peter_Spaeth, jcc6252, Brian_Dwyer, Jay_Wolt, Clydewally, bauce, Prince_Hal, ncinin, gonzo, PiratesWS1979, ZiggerZagger, Anthony + Al |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the best business reason I can come up with to ditch SGC. Collector's shutters SGC and announces a special deal to cross all of those cards to PSA slabs. Massive influx of cash for little effort.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve said it before. I’d love for all vintage to be shipped to SGC (whether under its current name, PSA, or some new PSA Vintage title). I see no reason why modern graders should be looking at 100+ year old stuff.
__________________
Collecting Federal League (1914-1915) H804 Victorian Trade Cards N48 & N508 Virginia Brights/Dixie/Sub Rosa NY Highlanders & Fed League Signatures ....and Japanese Menko Baseball Cards https://japanesemenkoarchive.blogspot.com/ |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Crazy idea and a bit off topic - make one of them vintage only so we don’t gotta wait months and months for a company grading millions of modern crap.
Edit - Wow JJ bond addressed this while I was typing Last edited by Beercan collector; 05-01-2025 at 11:25 AM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Could easily see PSA offering a window for folks to get their SGC cards crossed over to PSA holders at grade -- probably coinciding with PSA formally shutting down new SGC submissions at some point. "We recognize the rigorous historical standards of SGC grading are in line with our own here at PSA, etc, etc, etc.", and no charge if an SGC slab does not cross. Great moneymaker, and a way to refocus collectors to a new reality with TPG. I'm probably 95% PSA in my collection, and would cross most of the rest if offered the chance to do so affordably. That is despite positive memories and experiences grading with and working with SGC in the past. That said, I'd feel compelled to keep my T206 Lionel Carter Cobb and a T227 Charles Nagy Cobb in their original SGC holders. There would be something not right in my mind with failing to respect that provenance and history with SGC. |
__________________
| Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54. | WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5). T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And every dime you send to SGC is a public vote against PSA, providing more and more reasons for PSA to keep their own brand separate from that of SGC even if they are jointly owned. Last edited by robw1959; 05-01-2025 at 09:08 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Soon going to be down to CGC as the last resort for card grading.........
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 216/520 : 41.22% |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around R312 49/50 1959 Topps 568/572 1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956… ...whatever I want |
![]() |
|
|