![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the best business reason I can come up with to ditch SGC. Collector's shutters SGC and announces a special deal to cross all of those cards to PSA slabs. Massive influx of cash for little effort.
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve said it before. I’d love for all vintage to be shipped to SGC (whether under its current name, PSA, or some new PSA Vintage title). I see no reason why modern graders should be looking at 100+ year old stuff.
__________________
Collecting Federal League (1914-1915) H804 Victorian Trade Cards N48 & N508 Virginia Brights/Dixie/Sub Rosa NY Highlanders & Fed League Signatures ....and Japanese Menko Baseball Cards https://japanesemenkoarchive.blogspot.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Crazy idea and a bit off topic - make one of them vintage only so we don’t gotta wait months and months for a company grading millions of modern crap.
Edit - Wow JJ bond addressed this while I was typing Last edited by Beercan collector; 05-01-2025 at 11:25 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Could easily see PSA offering a window for folks to get their SGC cards crossed over to PSA holders at grade -- probably coinciding with PSA formally shutting down new SGC submissions at some point. "We recognize the rigorous historical standards of SGC grading are in line with our own here at PSA, etc, etc, etc.", and no charge if an SGC slab does not cross. Great moneymaker, and a way to refocus collectors to a new reality with TPG. I'm probably 95% PSA in my collection, and would cross most of the rest if offered the chance to do so affordably. That is despite positive memories and experiences grading with and working with SGC in the past. That said, I'd feel compelled to keep my T206 Lionel Carter Cobb and a T227 Charles Nagy Cobb in their original SGC holders. There would be something not right in my mind with failing to respect that provenance and history with SGC. |
__________________
| Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54. | WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5). T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ve actually seen PSA slabs with the Lionel Carter collection designation. So at some point someone crossed those SGC slabs to PSA, and PSA kept the provenance.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/schneids |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'll prefer to keep such cards in the original SGC holders, just given the documented history of those cards being turned over to SGC -- but 100% to each their own. Glad that historical provenance is not being lost with the crossover process. As the Net54 saying goes, every thread needs a card (or two). Both were an absolute joy to add many years back now. I can't tell if the Nagy reeks of cigarette smoke through the slab, sadly ![]() | |
__________________
| Private collector, always looking to buy great cards from the good folks on Net54. | WTB: N162 Kelly & Anson (any PSA) | '15 Cracker Jack WaJo (PSA 2-4) | '32 U.S. Caramel Gehrig (PSA 3-5) | '33 Goudey Ruth #'s 53/144/149 (PSA 4-5). T-206 Monster: 520/520 (PSA 4-6) Last edited by ZiggerZagger; 05-03-2025 at 07:18 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jason those are great cards
I had 1 of the Lionel Carter T206 Cobb's...Wish I still had it ![]() |
![]() |
|
|