![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don’t get that vibe examining it under 15x. Spider wrinkles top left.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
little wrinkles on the upper left edge about ear high, I'm assuming. Gorgeous card!
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful 3! Or 6 even.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stunner for a three, or a six. Wish I saw that first John, lol.
![]()
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see the wrinkles that go across the card. Great eye appeal but as was posted, it does give off a vibe of being trimmed. Top edge especially but could just be the way it scanned.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me begin by saying I really like SGC. However, there are two things I find annoying - the absence of explanations behind the grade, and the inconsistencies. I recently submitted a really nice '64 Topps HOFer. SGC graded it a 4. I cracked it out and immediately resubmitted it to SGC and it came back a 7. That's just plain ridiculous.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1....There is no way a card should jump 3 grades. SGC should have been apologizng instead of taking more money. Unless you are going for a registry set there isn't a ton of reason to buy high grade instead of high visual appeal.
The 3 originally posted looks like a 5-7 any day of the week. Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-24-2025 at 07:47 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great card John, I’d thrilled to own a stunning lower grade example as that
__________________
Successful Transactions: Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911 (I’m sure I’m missing some quality members) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is an awesome looking 3. Congrats.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That Greenberg is sharp!
Might be a good candidate to re-submit again, albeit other $15 handed over to SGC... The classic, "buy the card and not the grade" rings in my head for this Greenberg.
__________________
__________________ M@tt G@lvin Current Runs: 1956 Topps HOF Run: 11/36 Al Kaline Run: 7/22 M116 Blue HOF Background: 1/11 Instagram: @StraightRaceCards YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@StraightRaceCards |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which is nicer 1962T Yaz | Mountaineer1999 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-19-2023 05:15 AM |
New list of nicer bowmans | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-08-2022 11:10 AM |
Which one is nicer? | Rhotchkiss | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 81 | 08-16-2021 04:20 PM |
FS: A few nicer raw T207's | obcmac | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-22-2021 12:43 PM |
FS T206 Lajoie (With Bat) SGC 35 - Nicer | Gobucsmagic74 | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 08-09-2013 05:02 PM |