|
One of the Nicer SGC 3s I've Seen
2 Attachment(s)
Ebay purchase - technical grade is correct. Tickled to own it :)
Post your “Nice for the Grade” card. |
Trimmed?
It "feels" trimmed to me
|
Quote:
|
little wrinkles on the upper left edge about ear high, I'm assuming. Gorgeous card!
|
Beautiful 3! Or 6 even.
|
Stunner for a three, or a six. Wish I saw that first John, lol. :D
|
Quote:
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/150864751@N07/54470958934/in/dateposted-public/" title="1955 Skinner"><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54470958934_de0a50ced1_z.jpg" width="640" height="397" alt="1955 Skinner"/></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
We need a 'Heat Map'....
|
I always thought this one looked awfully nice for a 3:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...5f96a32ff5.jpg https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...54a3f6866c.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
My prized 48. Very small pen line on the back. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...407733fbbf.jpg
|
I love threads like this, John.
52 Red Man Mays and 62 Mays have wrinkles. 71 Aaron has a dent on the bottom right edge. The rest just feel a grade or two underappreciated... https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5971e064_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...8dd2178a_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...cb0316ab_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...02ca1a35_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5e82ee3e_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...f7dccf64_z.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...b0766cb2_z.jpg |
Quote:
|
Let me begin by saying I really like SGC. However, there are two things I find annoying - the absence of explanations behind the grade, and the inconsistencies. I recently submitted a really nice '64 Topps HOFer. SGC graded it a 4. I cracked it out and immediately resubmitted it to SGC and it came back a 7. That's just plain ridiculous.
|
+1....There is no way a card should jump 3 grades. SGC should have been apologizng instead of taking more money. Unless you are going for a registry set there isn't a ton of reason to buy high grade instead of high visual appeal.
The 3 originally posted looks like a 5-7 any day of the week. Quote:
|
Great card John, I’d thrilled to own a stunning lower grade example as that
|
That is an awesome looking 3. Congrats.
|
That Greenberg is sharp!
Might be a good candidate to re-submit again, albeit other $15 handed over to SGC... The classic, "buy the card and not the grade" rings in my head for this Greenberg. |
That Greenberg is a killer looking 3 for sure. Here is a card that looks great for the grade.
https://www.collectorfocus.com/image...e-namath-sgc-2 |
David, I'll say!
Namath looks fantastic |
4 Attachment(s)
I love low grade high eye appeal cards
|
2 Attachment(s)
My contribution, it took a long time to find out why it got a 3 but does have a very tiny pin hole.
|
Quote:
|
|
What a lovely Mullin 2, all for the sake of a very small piece of paper off the reverse side.
I’d buy cards like this all day long… |
I'll join
2 Attachment(s)
Just picked this up in Strongsville! No wrinkles under 10X magnifier. Small scuff on the back is all I could see.
|
2 Attachment(s)
I have always thought this one was undergraded.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Still don't know why this is a 3.5:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM. |