Why aren’t T213 type 1 considered T206

[tireolddawg]

Found it, thank you. And if I knew how to delete the thread I would (if that’s possible).

[cardsfan73]

Originally Posted by tireolddawg

Found it, thank you. And if I knew how to delete the thread I would (if that’s possible).

I can't seem to find the thread in question and would love to read it.

Any chance you could share the link?

[doug.goodman]

Originally Posted by tireolddawg

Found it, thank you. And if I knew how to delete the thread I would (if that’s possible).

Instead of deleting this thread, maybe add a link to the one you found...

[DeanH3]

There have been many, but I think this one might be the one.

https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...ghlight=coupon

[darwinbulldog]

Burdick decided to call them something else. If he'd called them T206s, we'd all consider them T206s. If he'd called T206 Polar Bears T213s, we'd be having this discussion about those instead. If there hadn't ever been T213-2s or T213-3s I can't imagine he wouldn't have just lumped them in with the T206s.

[Leon]

They are, and always have been, a different set. Burdick wrote the Catalog. His rules.
.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by darwinbulldog

Burdick decided to call them something else. If he'd called them T206s, we'd all consider them T206s. If he'd called T206 Polar Bears T213s, we'd be having this discussion about those instead. If there hadn't ever been T213-2s or T213-3s I can't imagine he wouldn't have just lumped them in with the T206s.

this! to me...they are t206's and i include them in my small t206 collection. Def more t206 than the cobb w/cobb back card...imho.

[cardsfan73]

Originally Posted by DeanH3

There have been many, but I think this one might be the one.

https://www.net54baseball.com/showth...ghlight=coupon

Thank you!