 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
10-11-2014, 12:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Is this really considered to be a Type 1 photo?
I usually don't think twice about vintage photos I see offered on Ebay, other auctions or the BST, but this one, in the recently ended Mears auction was just too cool for a baseball fan who has done his share of hunting in years past.
The question is, even though it has to be from the original negative and is identified as Type 1, do you guys who collect photographs consider these types of unpublished personal photographs to be Type 1. Do they have to come from newspapers, wire services or studios to be considered Type 1 by collectors, or are "snaphots" included in the definition beacuse they came directly from negatives? It doesn't really matter to me as I like the content and wanted the picture even without that designation. Just curious is all. Last edited by powderfinger; 10-11-2014 at 12:08 PM. Reason: . 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SOLD: 1953 Type I Press Photo - Ogden "A" Ball Team Photo wFrank Robinson PRookie | bcbgcbrcb | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 4 | 09-01-2013 10:16 AM |
| What is the Type 1 Type 2 photo designation | TT40391 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 03-02-2011 12:47 PM |
| Rare Type Cards Wanted -Trades Considered | Yankeefan51 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 05-31-2010 03:20 PM |
| Photo help Type 1? | Lordstan | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 10-02-2009 09:04 PM |
| Someone give me a good reason why Type 1 Coupons are not considered T206. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 07-17-2007 07:42 AM |
Threaded Mode