1966 Topps Information/Images Needed

[jmoran19]

Do these trip your trigger? HAHA

[jmoran19]

last one

[jmoran19]

legit raks

[JollyElm]

Question: have we all been spelling "rack packs" wrong? Is it actually "rak-paks"?? An internet search leaves me baffled, as it constantly switches "rak-pak" to "rack pack" and offers no actual answers.

F*cking search engines!!!!!!

[jmoran19]

Originally Posted by JollyElm

Question: have we all been spelling "rack packs" wrong? Is it actually "rak-paks"?? An internet search leaves me baffled, as it constantly switches "rak-pak" to "rack pack" and offers no actual answers.

F*cking search engines!!!!!!

Well Topps consistently spelled it “rak pak” for years so everything else is no bueno

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by jmoran19

Well Topps consistently spelled it “rak pak” for years so everything else is no bueno

I don't think I have ever seen the term written on a package or anything until today in this thread. It was just spoken words. Weird.

[bb66]

jmoran19--love those images--thanks!

[deweyinthehall]

Originally Posted by jmoran19

last one

The item advertised on the sell sheet, bottom right, seems to have to be the grocery packs. The ones on the left and in the middle both seem to be regular wax packs - codes 401 and 431. One case contains 24 boxes, the usual amount, and the other holds 12. I am going to guess that these were just different-sized cases on the same product - I initially wondered whether one might have held packs with rub-offs and the other not, but then these were tied to series so I don't think they'd be advertised as available at the same time.

[deweyinthehall]

Originally Posted by jmoran19

Do these trip your trigger? HAHA

Trigger tripped - page is getting updated tomorrow - THANKS!