![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I am not quite sure of the press details in 1954, if a feeder machine automated flipping the sheet over or if a human worker sat there and did it over and over all day. Dave might know better and chime in. This happens throughout the entirety of cardboard history - I have an ~1860's CDV that has the front text printed upside down from the lithographers back, and you can still on rare occasion find them today in a fresh pack of Topps. It was even a somewhat frequently recurring issue with 2021 Topps Heritage High Number, as I recall. All the Larsen wrong backs created like this would have a Seminick back, as the wrong back is dictated by being of whatever card is in the exact opposite position on the sheet. Wrong backs are, much less often, created in other ways. For example, a front sheet from a second series paired with a first series back sheet that was laying around the factory, often happening during pre-production testing. 1954 Bowman is not especially prone to this problem, but I have seen others. An exact card found this way, like a 1954 Larsen wrong back, is quite rare. You might look for an exact card with a wrong back and never find it in decades of searching. Please forgive my example of a boxing card, but as this is what I have handy on my hard drive and the 1954 Bowman sheet layout is not fully known, here's an example of how it happens. This Coburn has Gans printed upside down on the back. This happened because the sheet was run upside down. As we know the layout here, we can see that Coburn is in rows 5 and 6 on the left edge of the sheet, so if it was run upside down for the back printing it would be rows 5 and 6 from the opposite right end of the sheet that would be printed on his reverse. Sure enough, that's what happened here. It also illustrates why these are pretty rare - this card is clearly handcut, from a scrapped sheet that wasn't issued because it was caught in quality control. Two mistakes have to be made - a machine or worker has to flip the sheet incorrectly, and then the mistake has to be unnoticed for the card to slip into a pack and be issued. Last edited by G1911; 08-13-2024 at 10:23 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agree with Greg 100%. Maybe ToppCat will chime in. Nice card. A number of people collect wrong back cards.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In case anyone asks, PSA will not grade or authenticate wrong backs unless they are commonly known and are part of an official checklist. 1990 Donruss and 1989 Fleer have a couple of those.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great thread. Lots of interesting information.
Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you! This was going to be another question. I guess there is no easy way of authenticating the card.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC will grade and note wrong backs. Super easy.
.
__________________
. || || \/ If you want a deal, you might not get a card. If you want a card, you might not get a deal. Last edited by CardPadre; 08-14-2024 at 08:42 AM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah cool thank you!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As an added bonus, some enterprising previous owner felt compelled to correct some of the fake news on the back.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 08-14-2024 at 09:09 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice card, and you are a very lucky individual!
I don't know about PSA, but SGC will for sure. It was very common with the 1987 Topps set. I sent this one to SGC because it was a rookie card of Barry Larkin and had a Conseco back. Heck, SGC even labels it as such. I know you get a lot of advice on this card, but if you desire to sell it I would have it authenticated. That way, you won't have to deal with a potential buyer having questions regarding the authenticity. Probably well worth the $25 for SGC. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct: older cert.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even more exciting, they de-activated the cert at some point. I bought it, and then got them to re-activate it, maybe about 2 years ago.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
interesting |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() So, I have looked online for any evidence of another 1954 Bowman Larsen wrong back. This basically means Google--which of course is not comprehensive. Would love to know if anyone here has seen or heard about another one of these out in the wild? Thanks again to this great community! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
counterfeit 1951 bowman | HootsCards | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-05-2023 08:05 AM |
FS: 1954 Kaline and 1954 Bowman Yogi Both PSA 6 graded - SOLD | toadkc | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 03-29-2017 12:15 AM |
Breaking up 1954 Bowman and 1954 Sets | champaigneappetite | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-30-2013 10:49 PM |
Preferred method of storing early 50's Topps and Bowman? | the 'stache | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 12-06-2012 07:53 AM |
1951 Bowman Counterfeit Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-06-2003 01:36 PM |