1935 Chicle Nagurski-thoughts on this one?

[investinrookies]

Originally Posted by CardPadre

Yeah, I just thought they gave him a straight out “altered” result due to that cardsaver you showed. So however incorrectly he submitted it, if they didn’t just return it and kept his money, they sorted it out, evaluated the card and made a determination.

So I’m just saying if all the above is indeed the case…him going from “altered” to you as a “5.5” is sooooo much of a change of opinion to make without accountability.

Grading is a matter of opinion not accountability. It’s important to also sub correctly and remove any possible bias when submitting with regards to submitting in holders. I submitted a raw card and got the best professional opinion at the time of grading from the given grader. I don’t see anything wrong with any of this on either side.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CardPadre]

Originally Posted by investinrookies

Grading is a matter of opinion not accountability.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It could be a matter of both, that’s all I’m really saying.

[JohnP0621]

Congratulations. You took the risk and it payed off.
Beautiful Card.

Best Regards
John P

[Peter_Spaeth]

Congratulations.

I am surprised ASA actually had a legit card in their holder.

[JustinD]

Have to add my congratulations as well. Happy I was wrong, lol.

[ullmandds]

congrats! I'm not surprised at all. A shame there's one less HAGER slab out there! Great Score!!!!

[Exhibitman]

From chicken shit to chicken salad. Beautiful.

Such a clear case of bias on the original submission. You gotta know that PSA won’t take a shot at being burned on an ASA card.