![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This should just be the beginning. When they rolled out images of cards, they also rolled it out slow before making it automatically included for all cards.
My hope is that the notes will be better detailed. That way when images are compared that show the card to be altered, there will be notes that support the images. This should eliminate those that continue to excuse these visible before/after changes as scanner settings, image cherry picking, or even image photoshopping. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would venture to say a good bit of AI (augmented grading) is being used by PSA during this process. So cool :-)
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can assure you they are not.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Serious question for you though... Do you even own a single vintage card? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It would be interesting to be able to see the grader notes on this card. The images clearly show a stain on the top right in the before and there does not appear to be a stain on the after photo. Please note that the after photo was adjust by you to match the settings of the before and posted in a previous thread. Where did the stain go?? Either the stain never existed or it magically disappeared. If we had the graders notes, then we would have written evidence to support the visual evidence. I’m surprised that PSA and others will use photo matching to authenticate items since, as you claim, photo matching is “reflective of some sort of imaginary work.” I’m also curious as to why PSA would develop photo matching technology, like Genamint, to help track and detect altered cards. It was also interesting that PSA deactivated Kurt’s Card Care submission after being presented with before and after photos. It seems evident to me that using before and after images is a valid and reliable way to detect and determine if an alteration has been made on a card. Yes, I own vintage cards. I’m not here to argue or upset you. Therefore, this will be my only response to you on this thread. Take care. ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Perhaps worth noting (you clearly seem to have overlooked it) is the fact that despite PSA making an effort to clarify their "no grade/alterations" definitions, at no point anywhere in those definitions will you find anything at all about a card being soaked in water as being "altered". Why do you think that is? Oh, ya, BECAUSE IT'S A COMPLETELY STANDARD PRACTICE IN THIS HOBBY AND HAS BEEN FOR 100 YEARS. THEY ALLOW IT. Keep crying about it though. Last edited by Snowman; 06-29-2024 at 10:12 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Everyone has a right to their opinion. Try to remain calm.
If it's only water that is the cleaning solution, then, no the card shouldn't be graded only as AUT, assuming no other issues. Everyone knows that has been allowed forever. (by most hobbyists) Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Notes from a former card Grader/Authenticator | bn2cardz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 56 | 12-22-2023 08:07 AM |
Hey, who is the head grader at PSA now? | Gorditadogg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-15-2022 11:19 AM |
Someone who knows an SGC grader...... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-21-2008 01:48 PM |
Favorite Grader(s)... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-31-2008 04:27 AM |
The grader must've been blind on this one | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 06-21-2005 07:45 PM |