|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because the Heritage rep was operating under the false assumption that it would yield the maximum amount for the consigner, which would only be true if the bidding pool for both sides consisted of truly independent buyers. But they're not. Every set bidder would have bid on all individual lots had the set lot not been an option. It was an error on their part, and they likely still don't even know it. And they also probably still believe it netted the seller the most money, and they'll probably do it again next time.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
No. They're idiots.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1912 Boston Garters - Show'em :) | Bryan Long | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-21-2013 05:59 PM |
| Boston Garters Speaker & EVers F/S SOLD SOLD SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 02-01-2008 02:58 PM |
| Heritage Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-30-2007 01:57 PM |
| Boston Garters question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-23-2006 08:26 PM |
| D359's and Boston Garters For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2005 09:01 PM |