![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If that happens the base price is what the aggregate lots closed for plus $1 which Powell has already agreed to so the consignor is protected and only has upside potential.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Val said re-auction, it sounded like he was saying do it all over again, not just from the point where it closed, but maybe I misunderstood.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If Heritage goes that way you can't re auction with access to everybody, you've already identified the 13 interested parties, those are the only people who should be allowed to bid.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree but it's a highly unlikely scenario IMO. Although come to think of it, don't you need the underbidders too?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-01-2023 at 02:53 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The underbidders on the individual lots had their shot, now it's a question of the 12 highest bidders against Powell.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Right, if it starts from where it ended before.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At worst, I should be declared the winner at $1 more than the individual lots as the last bids on those closed the market. Otherwise, any “further bids” were intended to defeat the set price and were not specific to an individual card.
While still not right, the consignor gets the benefit of the doubt and the set stays together which I bet the consignor prefers as the story and legacy of the find continues. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1912 Boston Garters - Show'em :) | Bryan Long | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-21-2013 04:59 PM |
Boston Garters Speaker & EVers F/S SOLD SOLD SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 02-01-2008 01:58 PM |
Heritage Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-30-2007 12:57 PM |
Boston Garters question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-23-2006 07:26 PM |
D359's and Boston Garters For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2005 08:01 PM |