![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Allow me to remove my tongue from my cheek now. But I do agree with Peter that the market has paid a premium for them. I've seen bestickered pieces with 50-100% premium. Even when it doesn't get that ludicrous, the premium is often easily 10-20%. I suppose we can debate whether this result occurs because the item is truly superior even without the sticker, or whether the sticker itself is just worth that much. I will say that the PWCC sticker seems to mostly be about centering. And I think the market over the last few years has seen a more pronounced focus on centering, with well-centered pieces commanding a serious premium over the rest. So the sticker premium could be more about the centering premium more than anything.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks -- looks like the experts have spoken.
My first instinct was that it was overkill to have a grader grade another grader's grade, effectively. And then I googled PWCC and read about the allegations going back in their history. But it does seem like there are people paying for their eye appeal service. I tend to see them in cards where there is a high population of, say, 8s and a much lower population of (and much higher price for) 9s and 10s. Then the 8s get the eye appeal grade. I would have thought that sellers of high eye appeal cards could do something like superimpose images of their cards over one of those card centering tools. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Their eye appeal ratings were brilliant and ahead of their time. I realize that has always been an unpopular opinion and yeah I think they are a shady outfit to say the least. But the eye appeal ratings generated tremendous results at auction because the cards tended to have, well, great eye appeal.
I made this point a few years ago and a board regular freaked out about it. But I stand by it to this day. This does not excuse them from being involved in card doctoring, and many of the cards with strong eye appeal rankings surely were altered, but again, great concept. They could have built a great business on it but greed got in the way. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If a card has great centering, or otherwise has strong eye appeal, and you put up a good scan, why the hell does anyone need a sticker to tell them that???????? Are people really that helpless?
I suspect the stickers were mostly awarded to insiders and a high percentage were altered. So maybe they did serve the purpose of steering those who cared about altered cards AWAY from those examples.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-21-2023 at 08:48 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. A majority of hobbyists evidently need validation from a corporation for anything and everything.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It wasn’t that long ago, was it, that Brentsy was on top of the world.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A short reign thankfully, brought down by his criminality and.... oh wait, no, that didn't happen.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Still is, just for the eliti(st ) few!
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think my favorite part of the whole thing was how they had a couple of spelling errors in their writeup. I emailed them about it once and they told me to mind my own business.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 09-21-2023 at 09:15 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
*ENDED* 1955 Clemente Rookie, PWCC "Superior (Top5 %)" Eye Appeal Certification | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-31-2021 05:56 AM |
*SOLD* FS 1955 Koufax Rookie, PWCC "Above Average" Eye Appeal | GoBigRed | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-30-2021 09:29 AM |
CSA rating of 8 vs PSA rating of 8 Help?! | jeffmcurrie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 04-15-2014 03:49 PM |
T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |