PSA reholder issues - warning to submitters

[Rad_Hazard]

Attached is a screenshot the message. I've removed any personal info and any info relating to the name of the PSA person I was dealing with.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Rad_Hazard

Attached is a screenshot the message. I've removed any personal info and any info relating to the name of the PSA person I was dealing with.

I wonder if “current grade” refers to “the grade the card currently has”, rather than, “the way we currently grade”.

It’s obviously an important distinction, and it’s not clear to me that the author was all that precise in their wording.

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by raulus

I wonder if “current grade” refers to “the grade the card currently has”, rather than, “the way we currently grade”.



It’s obviously an important distinction, and it’s not clear to me that the author was all that precise in their wording.

Agreed, it could be taken either way.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by raulus

I wonder if “current grade” refers to “the grade the card currently has”, rather than, “the way we currently grade”.

It’s obviously an important distinction, and it’s not clear to me that the author was all that precise in their wording.

Regardless of the interpretation it is good enough reason to never do a reholder, damaged or not. Submitter gives up way too much control over their property at the whim of PSA's behind closed doors policies.