Should Some Interference Be Allowed In The BST Areas?

[SAllen2556]

I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway
Whatever it is, I'm against it
No matter what it is or who commenced it
I'm against it

Your proposition may be good
But let's have one thing understood:
Whatever it is, I'm against it
And even when you've changed it or condensed it
I'm against it
I'm opposed to it
On general principles, I'm opposed to it.

-The beauty of the free market is that it corrects itself. No need to mess with it here. I've always liked the philosophy that "the fewer the rules, the better".

[Tere1071]

Originally Posted by SAllen2556

I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway
Whatever it is, I'm against it
No matter what it is or who commenced it
I'm against it

Your proposition may be good
But let's have one thing understood:
Whatever it is, I'm against it
And even when you've changed it or condensed it
I'm against it
I'm opposed to it
On general principles, I'm opposed to it.

-The beauty of the free market is that it corrects itself. No need to mess with it here. I've always liked the philosophy that "the fewer the rules, the better".

Groucho Marx sang something like this in one of the Marx Brothers films, no?

Phil aka Tere1071

[Tabe]

If you're a seller bothered by someone posting comps that make your post look bad, you deserve to get called out.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Tabe

If you're a seller bothered by someone posting comps that make your post look bad, you deserve to get called out.

tru this

[Leon]

In case anyone didn't surmise the end result of this thread. The BST rule of no interference is staying in place. As the RULES state, if there is any fraud or factually incorrect information in a BST thread, it can still be posted about. Just like before.
I think it would be a shitshow if we allowed the interference we are speaking of, and I don't want to babysit the BST 24 hours a day.

and a card
.

[cubman1941]

Agree and thanks Leon.

[doug.goodman]

Originally Posted by Leon

In case anyone didn't surmise the end result of this thread. The BST rule of no interference is staying in place. As the RULES state, if there is any fraud or factually incorrect information in a BST thread, it can still be posted about. Just like before.
I think it would be a shitshow if we allowed the interference we are speaking of, and I don't want to babysit the BST 24 hours a day.

and a card
.

Seems like a case of good old fashioned "don't fix what's not broke", thanx Leon.

And a "card"

[Leon]

Originally Posted by doug.goodman

Seems like a case of good old fashioned "don't fix what's not broke", thanx Leon.

And a "card"

For me, it's not only don't fix what isn't broken, but also, if it's not a large improvement, it usually shouldn't be done. Who likes change?
and every rule has to be managed, so I still believe in fewer are better, or I would have to work more.

It was a valid subject to discuss.

and another card



.