NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2022, 11:17 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul View Post
I can't believe no one has mentioned that the Hall of Fame ballot has been announced.
There was a thread in the Sports watercooler.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2022, 11:24 PM
Snowman Snowman is offline
Travis
Tra,vis Tr,ail - Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 2,446
Default

Bonds and Clemens both deserve to be in the hall IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2022, 04:22 AM
Jim65's Avatar
Jim65 Jim65 is offline
Jam.es Braci.liano
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,282
Default

I used to be against Bonds, Clemens and Palmiero getting in the HOF but now that we have a known PED cheater in, its unfair to keep them out.

McGriff should get in, Belle and Schilling are deserving but probably do not get in.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2022, 05:06 AM
bxb bxb is offline
Larry P.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 279
Default

My understanding is that there are 16 voters, who get a maximum of 3 votes each. This leads to a total of 48 votes maximum.

Players must get 75% to get in (i.e. 12 or more of the 16 voters).

So at most 4 players can get in (48 divided by 12).

Somebody double check my math here, I have not had my morning coffee yet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2022, 06:25 AM
ejharrington ejharrington is offline
Er.ic H@rrington
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 639
Default

Schilling should get in.
__________________
Contact me if you have any Dave Kingman cards / memorabilia for sale.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2022, 07:17 AM
mrreality68's Avatar
mrreality68 mrreality68 is online now
Jeffrey Kuhr
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 6,020
Default

All worthy in their own way that is why they are on list
But with doping, politics, and injuries effecting longevity (Mattingly) they all have questions.
McGriff and Shilling should be the Easy in but it will be interesting to see what happens with them and the rest.
Look forward to Dec announcement
Just wish we knew who the voters were and wish all ballots were made public
__________________
Thanks all

Jeff Kuhr

https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/

Looking for
1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards
1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose
1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth
1921 Frederick Foto Ruth
Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards
Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards
1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson
1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson
1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2022, 08:36 AM
Yoda Yoda is offline
Joh.n Spen.cer
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,243
Default

McGriff's association with Halle Berry should be worth something.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2022, 02:40 PM
philo98 philo98 is offline
Ryan Phi
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 152
Default

delete

Last edited by philo98; 11-09-2022 at 02:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2022, 05:09 PM
bmattioli's Avatar
bmattioli bmattioli is offline
Bruce Mattioli
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hartford Conn
Posts: 487
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim65 View Post
I used to be against Bonds, Clemens and Palmiero getting in the HOF but now that we have a known PED cheater in, its unfair to keep them out.

McGriff should get in, Belle and Schilling are deserving but probably do not get in.
Who are you referring to?
__________________
***********
USAF Veteran
84-94
***********
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2022, 06:44 PM
jamest206 jamest206 is offline
James
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Colorado
Posts: 270
Default

No strike, no PED’s. Let them in!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-09-2022, 12:47 AM
Tabe's Avatar
Tabe Tabe is offline
Chris
Chr.is Ta.bar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 1,504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmattioli View Post
Who are you referring to?
David Ortiz.

Ortiz himself has confirmed he failed a test. It's not a rumor, it's not "supposedly", etc.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/d...sted-positive/
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2022, 09:32 AM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabe View Post
David Ortiz.

Ortiz himself has confirmed he failed a test. It's not a rumor, it's not "supposedly", etc.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/d...sted-positive/
I believe the current version of the narrative from Ortiz fans is that it doesn’t count because MLB won’t certify it (they can’t) and it wasn’t supposed to be public (like basically all wrongdoing in human history, and every players use). Thus Ortiz should be let off the hook, but everyone else who is not a Red Sox player or media darling can be punished. You know it’s a loser of a case when this is the argument they are left with.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-09-2022, 11:43 AM
drmondobueno's Avatar
drmondobueno drmondobueno is offline
Keith
ke.ith tem.ple
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Eastern sierras, Calif
Posts: 951
Default Sos

Why not Rose and Joe Jackson?

Using the old arguments are at least hypocritical and at best self serving.

Besides, I want a price bump on my Rose collection when he goes into the hall
__________________
T206 156/518 second time around
R312 49/50
1959 Topps 568/572
1958, 1961, 1963, 1964, 1957, 1956…
...whatever I want
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2022, 10:36 AM
HistoricNewspapers HistoricNewspapers is offline
Brian
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
I believe the current version of the narrative from Ortiz fans is that it doesn’t count because MLB won’t certify it (they can’t) and it wasn’t supposed to be public (like basically all wrongdoing in human history, and every players use). Thus Ortiz should be let off the hook, but everyone else who is not a Red Sox player or media darling can be punished. You know it’s a loser of a case when this is the argument they are left with.
If Ortiz was a vocal Republican then it would have been used against him and he would not be in...kind of like how Curt Schilling is being kept out. Writers have bias. Whoever on the committee will have bias. Its the nature of the beast. Some have it work in their advantage, some don't.

Ortiz should not be in while the other better players who may have used as well are not in.

If Schilling is not in due to his personality, then the same standard should be applied to every player, and then Dale Murphy should be in due to his personality being exemplary.

Nobody is a capable judge on someone else's character unless they see that person's actions 100% of the time and every second of their life. All they see is an incomplete picture either positive or negative. There are a lot of wolves in sheep's clothing and you never really know.

Last edited by HistoricNewspapers; 11-11-2022 at 11:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: 2022 Hall of Fame Ballot (and cards) Mike D. Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) 0 12-04-2021 06:55 PM
2016 Hall of Fame Ballot, Who would you vote for? cardsfan73 Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk 140 01-16-2016 10:04 AM
Golden Era Hall of Fame Ballot announced bigtrain Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 160 12-09-2014 08:40 AM
Hall of Fame Ballot Announced bigtrain Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk 34 01-08-2014 02:45 PM
Hall of Fame Veterans Committee Ballot paul Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 11-15-2009 07:43 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:46 AM.


ebay GSB